How Can Discontinuous Driving Functions Be Solved Without LaPlace Transforms?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Skrew
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on solving differential equations (DEs) with discontinuous driving functions without using LaPlace Transforms. Participants confirm that methods such as Undetermined Coefficients and Variation of Parameters can be employed, albeit with increased complexity. The characteristic polynomial of a homogeneous linear ordinary differential equation (ODE) is noted to correlate with the denominator of the Laplace transform, highlighting a significant relationship in solving these equations. The conversation emphasizes the tedious nature of these alternative methods compared to the efficiency of LaPlace Transforms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Differential Equations (DEs)
  • Familiarity with LaPlace Transforms
  • Knowledge of Undetermined Coefficients method
  • Experience with Variation of Parameters technique
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Undetermined Coefficients method for solving linear DEs
  • Explore Variation of Parameters in depth
  • Investigate the relationship between characteristic polynomials and Laplace transforms
  • Practice solving discontinuous driving functions using alternative methods
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics and engineering, particularly those focused on solving differential equations and exploring alternative methods to LaPlace Transforms.

Skrew
Messages
131
Reaction score
0
I have been studying LaPlace Transforms and I have learned how they are used to solve DE's with discontinuous driving functions, which is certainly interesting but I was wondering is it possible to solve the same DE's using other methods such as Undetermined Coefficients or Variation of Parameters(and how would it be done)?

I have an idea of how you might be able to so, solving each continuous DE separably then adjusting the constants so the graphs meet consecutively but I don't know if this is correct.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes it is. but it is very tedious.

As a side note, the characteristic polynomial of a homogenous linear ODE is the same as the denominator of the Laplace transform. This is no coincidence.
 
Dickfore said:
Yes it is. but it is very tedious.

As a side note, the characteristic polynomial of a homogenous linear ODE is the same as the denominator of the Laplace transform. This is no coincidence.

So how would you go about doing it?

I was also wondering about why the characteristic polynomial shows up, to be completely honest I don't have a great understanding of LaPlace Transforms beyond them being a transform and something that is used to solve linear DE IVP's.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K