How can I calculate the eigenvalues of a Hamiltonian with spin 1/2 objects?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the eigenvalues of a Hamiltonian involving spin 1/2 objects, specifically expressed in terms of angular momentum operators. The original poster presents a Hamiltonian and attempts to manipulate it into a more manageable form for analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster rewrites the Hamiltonian and defines new angular momentum operators, questioning the validity of their approach. Other participants provide feedback on the correctness of the method and raise points about the degeneracy of energy levels.

Discussion Status

Some participants affirm the original poster's method as correct, while others suggest considerations regarding the degeneracy of energy levels and the relationships between the defined angular momentum states. Multiple interpretations of the degeneracy are being explored without explicit consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the implications of angular momentum additions and the correlation of magnetic quantum numbers to the total angular momentum states, indicating a complex relationship that may affect the degeneracy calculations.

JohanL
Messages
154
Reaction score
0
Find the eigenvalues of the hamiltonian

[tex] H=a(S_A \cdot S_B+S_B \cdot S_C+S_C \cdot S_D+S_D \cdot S_A)[/tex]

where S_A, S_B, S_C, S_D are spin 1/2 objects
_________________________

I rewrite it as

[tex] H=(1/2)*a*[(S_A+S_B+S_C+S_D)^2-(S_A+S_C)^2-(S_B+S_D)^2][/tex]

then i define

[tex] J_1=S_A+S_B+S_C+S_D[/tex]

[tex] J_2=S_A+S_C[/tex]

[tex] J_3=S_B+S_D[/tex]

and uses

[tex] J^2_i |j_1j_2j_3;m_1m_2m_3> = (h^2) j_i(j_i+1)|j_1j_2j_3;m_1m_2m_3>[/tex]

which gives the energies

[tex] E(j_1,j_2,j_3)=(h^2/2)*a*[j_1(j_1+1)-j_2(j_2+1)-j_3(j_3+1)][/tex]

Where j_1 is addition of four angular momentum of 1/2 which gives it values of 0 1, 2 and in the same way j_2 and j_3 have values of 0 1.

Am i doing this the right way? It doesn't feel so :smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
From the structure of your hamiltonian it almost looks like you could adapt transfer matrix methods, unless your spin things are vectors (I'm not clear on that). I would also say that there are restrictions on [tex]j_2[/tex] and [tex]j_3[/tex] based on [tex]j_1[/tex], but the thought process seems right.
 
Your method is completely correct. Just include the a.
Did it just seem too easy?
 
Meir Achuz said:
Your method is completely correct. Just include the a.
Did it just seem too easy?

Thank you. Yes it seemed too easy :smile:
 
How about the degeneracy of the energy levels.
For example E(010)=E(001)=E(111) and then m_1 can take on 9 different values , m_2 and m_3 5 different values. So the degeneracy of this level is 3*9*5*5 ? Is it correct so far?

But then the j_i in turn are addtions of angular momentums.
Does this add even more to the degeneracy?
 
I would count the degeneracy of each estate as the product of 2j+1 for each sub j. So I think it is 3+3+27 for your example. You shouldn't just count the m's because they are correlated to give the j estates.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K