How can I factorize this function into A(a) and X(x)?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter picard
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the factorization of the function \(\frac{g(x)-g(a)}{u(a)^2}=K(x,a)\) into the product of two functions, \(A(a)\) and \(X(x)\). Participants explore the implications of this factorization in the context of integral equations, particularly focusing on separability and the existence of analytical solutions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to factor \(K(x,a)\) into \(A(a) X(x)\) to facilitate solving an integral equation.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism, suggesting that such a factorization may not be possible.
  • A different viewpoint proposes that while \(K(x,a)\) is not separable, it can be expressed as a sum of separable terms, which could be worked with separately.
  • Further contributions discuss the implications of separable versus non-separable kernels in the context of Fredholm and Volterra integral equations, noting that separability simplifies the solution process.
  • One participant clarifies that their integral equation is a Volterra of the second kind, emphasizing the complexity of solving it if \(K(x,a)\) is not separable.
  • Another participant concludes that the assumption of separability leads to contradictions regarding the properties of \(g(x)\), suggesting that \(K(x,a)\) cannot be expressed as \(A(a) X(x)\).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of factorizing \(K(x,a)\) into \(A(a) X(x)\). While some suggest methods to approach the problem, others argue that such a factorization is not possible, leading to an unresolved discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the assumptions about the functions involved, particularly regarding the non-constancy of \(g(x)\) and the nature of the kernel \(K(x,a)\). The implications of separability in integral equations are also noted as a critical factor in determining the solvability of the problem.

picard
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I need some help factorizing the following:

[tex]\frac{g(x)-g(a)}{u(a)^2}=K(x,a)[/tex]

into [tex]A(a) X(x)[/tex]

ie I want to find [tex]A(a), X(x)[/tex] such that their product is the first equation. The reason I want to do this is because K(x,a) is a kernel and it would help a lot if somehow I could write it as:

[tex]K(x,a)=A(a) X(x)[/tex]

Finally, note that [tex]g'(a)=a/u(a)^2[/tex]

Any ideas?

Thanks in advance
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Off hand, I believe what you want can't be done.
 
Well, that was my first guess as well, but I thought that someone might have an idea...
 
Kernel in an integral equation? While that is not separable, you can write it as a sum of separable terms:
[tex]\frac{g(x)}{u(a)^2}- \frac{g(a)}{u(a)^2}[/tex]
and work with each part separately.
 
Yes, I have tried that. However, then the integral equation is not solvable, while if the kernel can be written with only one term as K(x,a)=A(a) X(x) then there exists an analytical solution...
 
I assume, then, that you are talking about a Fredholm integral equation:
[tex]y(x)= \inf_a^b K(x,t)y(t)dt+ f(t)[/itex]<br /> <br /> Yes, if K(x,t) is "separable", K(x,t)= A(x)B(t), then the solution is easy. The equation becomes<br /> [tex]y(x)= A(x)\int_a^b B(t)y(t)dt+ f(x)[/itex]<br /> and <br /> [tex]\int_a^b B(t)y(t)dt[/tex]<br /> is a number. Let <br /> [tex]X= \int_a^b B(t)y(t)dt[/tex]<br /> and you have y(x)= X A(x)+ f(x) so it is just a matter of solving for X. Multiply both sides of that equation by B(x) and integrate from a to b.<br /> [tex]\int_a^b B(x)y(x)dx= X\int_a^b A(x)B(x)dx+ \int_a^b B(x)F(x)dx[/tex]<br /> The integral on the left is just X again and the other two integrals are of known functions. Let <br /> [tex]K= \int_a^b A(x)B(x)dx[/tex]<br /> and <br /> [tex]F= \int_a^b B(x)f(x)dx[/tex]<br /> and X satisfies the equation X= KX+ F which is easily solvable for X.<br /> <br /> Now, suppose K(x,t) is not separable but is the sum of two separable functions: K(x,t)= A1(x)B1(t)+ A2(x)B2(t). we can still take the "x" dependence out of the equations:<br /> [tex]y(x)= A1(x)\int_a^b B1(t)y(t)dt+ A2(x)\int_a^b B2(t)y(t)dt+ f(x)[/tex]<br /> Let<br /> [tex]X1= \int_a^b B1(t)y(t)dt[/tex]<br /> and<br /> [tex]X2= \int_a^b B2(t)y(t)dt[/tex]<br /> Now,<br /> [tex]y(t)= X1A1(x)+ X2A2(x)+ f(x)[/itex]<br /> and we only need to find the numbers X1 and X2.<br /> If we multiply that equation by B1(x) and integrate:<br /> [tex]\int_a^b B1(x)y(x)dx= X1\int_a^b A1(x)B1(x)dx+ X2\int_a^b A2(x)B1(x)dx+ \int_a^b B1(x)f(x)dx[/itex]<br /> Again, the left side is just X1 and the integrals on the right are numbers:<br /> [tex]X1= K_{11}X1+ K_{12}X2+ F1[/tex]<br /> with the obvious notation. Doing the same with B2(x), <br /> [tex]X2= K_{12}X1+ K_{22}X2+ F2[/tex]<br /> <br /> That is, we have two linear equations to solve for X1 and X2. (And, in fact, the system is symmetric, guarenteeing real solutions.)<br /> <br /> The extension to any kernel which is a finite sum of separable functions should be obvious and, in fact, it can be extended to an infinite sum of such functions, giving an infinite series solution.[/tex][/tex][/tex][/tex]
 
@HallsofIvy: Thanks for taking the time and effort to write your answer! I really appreciate it. However, you assumed erroneously... My integral equation is a Voltera of the second kind... The thing is that for a seperable kernel with one term (like the one I am looking for) the solution is readily available, see for example:

http://eqworld.ipmnet.ru/en/solutions/ie/ie0214.pdf

However, if K(x,t) is not separable but is the sum of two separable functions then you have to solve a system of ODEs instead of an algebric (simultaneous) system... In my case the system with the ODEs is quite complicated and that's why I decided to ask if somebody knew of a way to factorize my kernel (so that I could use the analytical solution of the link).

Again, thanks and sorry...
 
picard said:
Hi,
I need some help factorizing the following:

[tex]\frac{g(x)-g(a)}{u(a)^2}=K(x,a)[/tex]

into [tex]A(a) X(x)[/tex]
(I'm assuming that g is known not to be a constant function)

A(0) X(0) = 0

A(0) X(x) = (g(x) - g(0)) / u(0)^2 which is nonzero

Therefore, A(0) is nonzero, and so X(0) = 0.

0 = A(x) X(0) = (g(0) - g(x)) / u(x)^2

Therefore, g(0) = g(x) for all x, which contradicts the fact g is nonconstant

Therefore, K(x,a) cannot be written as A(a) X(x).
 
@Hurkyl: Thanks, at least I now know that there is no solution to this problem and I can move on.

Cheers
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K