How can I get help with the ENGAA Questions Section 1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TomK
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around questions from the ENGAA (Engineering Admissions Assessment) 2019, specifically focusing on various problems from two sections of the test. Participants are seeking clarification on their answers and the reasoning behind them, particularly in the context of physics concepts and problem-solving strategies.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to validate their answers and understanding of specific questions, expressing uncertainty about the correctness of their methods and reasoning. Some participants question the assumptions made in the original poster's interpretations, particularly regarding forces and motion in question Q16. Others suggest breaking down the questions into separate threads for more focused assistance.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the questions, providing insights and suggestions for improvement. There is a recognition of the need for clearer problem statements and a more organized approach to discussing multiple questions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the reasoning behind specific answers, but no consensus has been reached on the interpretations of all statements.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraint of attempting the questions without a calculator, which may influence their problem-solving approaches. The original poster has referenced unofficial solutions but indicates that these did not aid in their understanding.

TomK
Messages
69
Reaction score
14
New poster has been reminded to only post one question at a time
Homework Statement
All of the following questions are from ENGAA 2019 (the pre-interview test for Cambridge's Engineering course). The questions are to be attempted without using a calculator. It has two separate sections (1 and 2). The correct answers are written next to each question below. I looked at some (unofficial) worked solutions online (http://www.engineeringadmissionsassessment.com/2019-solutions.html), but it didn't help me understand/finish the questions below.
Relevant Equations
Physics Equations: https://www.ocr.org.uk/Images/536433-data-sheet.pdf

Maths Equations (see page 2 and 3 for formula sheet, ignore the questions): https://www.ocr.org.uk/Images/535673-question-paper-pure-mathematics-and-mechanics.pdf
Section 1:

Q6 - answer: A -

Q11 - answer: B -

Q15 - answer: D -

Q17 - answer: E -

Q19 - answer: E - I got this question correct, but I didn't get an exact answer of '8', so I'm thinking my method was not optimal/has a degree of error? -

Q33 - answer: A -

Q35 - answer: E - https://imgur.com/a/8wjtXjl

Q36 - answer: D - https://imgur.com/a/IbAcLCkSection 2:

Q2 - answer: A - https://imgur.com/a/lshcAeO

Q5 - answer: E - https://imgur.com/a/Oj2lgUe

Q8 - answer: C - https://imgur.com/a/gafezZ5

Q11 - answer: C - https://imgur.com/a/BdkKjct

Q12 - answer: A - https://imgur.com/a/hWVPjov

Q13 - answer: B - https://imgur.com/a/5BNU0uy

Q14 - answer: C - https://imgur.com/a/kwBy3Bm

Q16 - answer: F - https://imgur.com/a/vp58SIn - I think I get why Statement 1 is right. Is it because, when the object is not in-motion, there is no air resistance, therefore weight force will be the only force acting down (which means magnitude of acceleration = g)? I don't know how to prove Statement 2 wrong. Statement 3 is correct, but is it because energy is wasted in every transformation (due to air resistance when in-motion)?

Q18 - answer: B - https://imgur.com/duOp1t8 - no working for this one, since I don't know what angle to choose (for theta) or how to know the other angles in the triangle?Thank you for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TomK said:
Homework Statement:: All of the following questions are from ENGAA 2019 (the pre-interview test for Cambridge's Engineering course). The questions are to be attempted without using a calculator. It has two separate sections (1 and 2). The correct answers are written next to each question below. I looked at some (unofficial) worked solutions online (http://www.engineeringadmissionsassessment.com/2019-solutions.html), but it didn't help me understand/finish the questions below.
This too much for one thread. Please post each question in a separate thread and give more indication of what your issue is with each.
This will allow several different helpers to assist you in parallel.

I will answer this one to go on with:

Q16 - answer: F - I think I get why Statement 1 is right. Is it because, when the object is not in-motion, there is no air resistance, therefore weight force will be the only force acting down (which means magnitude of acceleration = g)? I don't know how to prove Statement 2 wrong. Statement 3 is correct, but is it because energy is wasted in every transformation (due to air resistance when in-motion)?​

1) yes, though the reasoning ought to show not only that it will be free fall acceleration at the top but also that that is the only place it will be free fall.
2) you can answer this by trusting the graph. Distance covered equals area bounded, so the time of return to original position will be where the areas above and below the axis are equal.
3) yes
 
Last edited:
For the last one, rewrite $$\begin{align*}\int_{-2}^2 5f(x) dx - \int_{-2}^4 f(x) dx &= \int_{-2}^2 5f(x) dx - \left( \int_{-2}^2 f(x) dx + \int_2^4 f(x) dx \right) = 7 \\

&= \int_{-2}^2 4f(x) dx - \int_{2}^4 f(x) dx = 7\end{align*}$$By what constant can you multiply this equation by so that, when you then subtract it from the first equation, you get another equation only involving ##\int_2^4 f(x) dx##?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
haruspex said:
This too much for one thread. Please post each question in a separate thread and give more indication of what your issue is with each.
This will allow several different helpers to assist you in parallel.
Agreed, but please figure out each problem before posting the next. The parallelism model is close to spamming (like this thread here). Thanks. This thread is locked.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
8K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
10K