How can I identify the molecular fomula, based on an m/z of 350.7897?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bellum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Molecule
AI Thread Summary
To identify the molecular formula based on an m/z of 350.7897, utilize tools like www.chemcalc.org to explore potential structures. Analyze the mass spectrum, focusing on the highest mass ion and the differences between peaks to deduce possible atom groups. Consider the nitrogen rule and fragmentation patterns to align with the other m/z values. Repeat this process for various fragment losses to construct the molecular structure. This systematic approach will help clarify the molecular formula.
bellum
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical forums to the schoolwork forums
TL;DR Summary: I have the aforementioned m/z and a mass spec graph, my lecturer completely glossed over how to find the molecular formula so I'm stumped.

I have a mass spec with 4 peaks and the m/z value, how can I find the molecular formula.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1000029274.jpg
 
Maybe this can help you

 
You have a very exact mass. Use www.chemcalc.org to find possible structures. Remember the nitrogen rule. Deduce possible structures and look if their fragmentation patterns fit the other m/z tops.
 
What do you think the highest mass ion represents (in most examples for students to solve, that is).
What do you think the difference between two peaks represents?
What group of atoms could that be?
Repeat for several of the fragment losses.
Build the molecule.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top