MHB How can I prove that gcd(a,b) is an integer and gcd(a/b, b/h) = 1?

AI Thread Summary
To prove that gcd(a,b) is an integer and that gcd(a/h, b/h) = 1, it is essential to recognize that h, defined as gcd(a,b), divides both a and b, confirming its integer status. The discussion highlights that if a/h and b/h shared a common factor, it would contradict the definition of h as the greatest common divisor. The first statement regarding a divided by b being an integer is disputed, as there is no inherent reason for this to be true. The second statement is affirmed as true and is referenced from "Elementary Number Theory" by Dudley. Overall, the key takeaway is the relationship between the definitions of gcd and the implications of integer division.
simo1
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
can I get hints on how to prove this question:

let a,b be in Z(integer) with h=gcd(a,b) not equal to zero then [(a divide b), (b divide h)] are in Z. and gcd[ (a divide h, b divide h)]=1
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Did you mean "a divide h"? The first part is pretty much the definition of the greatest common divisor ("the greatest integer which divides both numbers", so trivially $h$ divides both $a$ and $b$). What definition of the gcd are you working from? For the second part, suppose that $a/h$ and $b/h$ shared a common factor, so that their gcd was not equal to $1$. Would that not conflict with the definition of $h = \gcd(a, b)$? Can you see the problem?
 
Let me restate the problem to see if I understand it correctly.


Given that a,b are integers, h=gcd(a,b) and h not equal to 0 then
is it true that:
  1. a divided by b and b divided by h are integers
  2. gcd(a divided by h, b divided by h)=1


Statement 2 is true and is given as Theorem 1 in "Elementary Number Theory" by Dudley.

In Statement 1, there is no reason why a divided by b should be an integer.
 
Last edited:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top