How can I rederive this Mathematica result for a complex equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thatboi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematica
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving a solution for a complex equation involving real parameters. The user is seeking assistance in rederiving a result provided by Mathematica, which states that the solution for x is given by a specific formula. A participant suggests starting by multiplying both sides of the equation and equating real and imaginary coefficients, emphasizing the importance of careful algebraic manipulation. They also caution that errors may arise from confusion between the parameters m1 and m2 or from sign mistakes. The conversation highlights the need for detailed work to identify potential errors in the derivation process.
thatboi
Messages
130
Reaction score
20
Hey all,
I am trying to solve the following equation: $$\left(k-i\frac{m_{1}}{v}\right)^{-1}\Bigg(-i\frac{x}{v}-\frac{\sqrt{-x^2+m_{1}^2+k^2v^2}}{v}\Bigg) = \left(k+i\frac{m_{2}}{v}\right)^{-1}\Bigg(i\frac{x}{v}+\frac{\sqrt{-x^2+m_{2}^2+k^2v^2}}{v}\Bigg)$$ for ##x## and we can assume ##m_{1},m_{2},k,v## are all real and ##i## is the imaginary unit. Now mathematica tells me that the solution is $$x=\pm\frac{kv(m_{1}+m_{2})}{\sqrt{(m_{1}-m_{2})^2+4k^2v^2}}$$ but I am having trouble rederiving the result. Any advice would be appreciated!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
thatboi said:
Hey all,
I am trying to solve the following equation: $$\left(k-i\frac{m_{1}}{v}\right)^{-1}\Bigg(-i\frac{x}{v}-\frac{\sqrt{-x^2+m_{1}^2+k^2v^2}}{v}\Bigg) = \left(k+i\frac{m_{2}}{v}\right)^{-1}\Bigg(i\frac{x}{v}+\frac{\sqrt{-x^2+m_{2}^2+k^2v^2}}{v}\Bigg)$$ for ##x## and we can assume ##m_{1},m_{2},k,v## are all real and ##i## is the imaginary unit. Now mathematica tells me that the solution is $$x=\pm\frac{kv(m_{1}+m_{2})}{\sqrt{(m_{1}-m_{2})^2+4k^2v^2}}$$ but I am having trouble rederiving the result. Any advice would be appreciated!
Without seeing your work there is little we can do to help.

Here's step 1 (as I see it.) Multiply both sides out and equate real and imaginary coefficients.

-Dan
 
$$\left(k-i\frac{m_{1}}{v}\right)^{-1}\Bigg(-i\frac{x}{v}-\frac{\sqrt{-x^2+m_{1}^2+k^2v^2}}{v}\Bigg) = \left(k+i\frac{m_{2}}{v}\right)^{-1}\Bigg(i\frac{x}{v}+\frac{\sqrt{-x^2+m_{2}^2+k^2v^2}}{v}\Bigg)$$
\begin{align*}
\dfrac{kv+i m_2}{kv-i m_1}&=-\dfrac{ix+\sqrt{-x^2+m_{2}^2+k^2v^2}}{ix+\sqrt{-x^2+m_{1}^2+k^2v^2}}=
-\dfrac{ix+\sqrt{-x^2+m_{2}^2+k^2v^2}}{ix+\sqrt{-x^2+m_{1}^2+k^2v^2}}\cdot \dfrac{ix-\sqrt{-x^2+m_{1}^2+k^2v^2}}{ix-\sqrt{-x^2+m_{1}^2+k^2v^2}}\\
&=\dfrac{\left(ix+\sqrt{-x^2+m_{2}^2+k^2v^2}\right)\cdot \left(ix-\sqrt{-x^2+m_{1}^2+k^2v^2}\right)}{m_1^2+k^2v^2}
\end{align*}
\begin{align*}
\left(kv+i m_2\right)\left(kv+i m_1\right)&=\left(ix+\sqrt{-x^2+m_{2}^2+k^2v^2}\right)\cdot \left(ix-\sqrt{-x^2+m_{1}^2+k^2v^2}\right)\\
&\vdots\\
&\text{etc.}
\end{align*}
... until you end up with ##1=1## or ##1=0##. If it was wrong, then very likely due to a confusion of ##m_1## and ##m_2## or a sign error.
 
  • Like
Likes thatboi and topsquark
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top