How can I rederive this Mathematica result for a complex equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thatboi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematica
thatboi
Messages
130
Reaction score
20
Hey all,
I am trying to solve the following equation: $$\left(k-i\frac{m_{1}}{v}\right)^{-1}\Bigg(-i\frac{x}{v}-\frac{\sqrt{-x^2+m_{1}^2+k^2v^2}}{v}\Bigg) = \left(k+i\frac{m_{2}}{v}\right)^{-1}\Bigg(i\frac{x}{v}+\frac{\sqrt{-x^2+m_{2}^2+k^2v^2}}{v}\Bigg)$$ for ##x## and we can assume ##m_{1},m_{2},k,v## are all real and ##i## is the imaginary unit. Now mathematica tells me that the solution is $$x=\pm\frac{kv(m_{1}+m_{2})}{\sqrt{(m_{1}-m_{2})^2+4k^2v^2}}$$ but I am having trouble rederiving the result. Any advice would be appreciated!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
thatboi said:
Hey all,
I am trying to solve the following equation: $$\left(k-i\frac{m_{1}}{v}\right)^{-1}\Bigg(-i\frac{x}{v}-\frac{\sqrt{-x^2+m_{1}^2+k^2v^2}}{v}\Bigg) = \left(k+i\frac{m_{2}}{v}\right)^{-1}\Bigg(i\frac{x}{v}+\frac{\sqrt{-x^2+m_{2}^2+k^2v^2}}{v}\Bigg)$$ for ##x## and we can assume ##m_{1},m_{2},k,v## are all real and ##i## is the imaginary unit. Now mathematica tells me that the solution is $$x=\pm\frac{kv(m_{1}+m_{2})}{\sqrt{(m_{1}-m_{2})^2+4k^2v^2}}$$ but I am having trouble rederiving the result. Any advice would be appreciated!
Without seeing your work there is little we can do to help.

Here's step 1 (as I see it.) Multiply both sides out and equate real and imaginary coefficients.

-Dan
 
$$\left(k-i\frac{m_{1}}{v}\right)^{-1}\Bigg(-i\frac{x}{v}-\frac{\sqrt{-x^2+m_{1}^2+k^2v^2}}{v}\Bigg) = \left(k+i\frac{m_{2}}{v}\right)^{-1}\Bigg(i\frac{x}{v}+\frac{\sqrt{-x^2+m_{2}^2+k^2v^2}}{v}\Bigg)$$
\begin{align*}
\dfrac{kv+i m_2}{kv-i m_1}&=-\dfrac{ix+\sqrt{-x^2+m_{2}^2+k^2v^2}}{ix+\sqrt{-x^2+m_{1}^2+k^2v^2}}=
-\dfrac{ix+\sqrt{-x^2+m_{2}^2+k^2v^2}}{ix+\sqrt{-x^2+m_{1}^2+k^2v^2}}\cdot \dfrac{ix-\sqrt{-x^2+m_{1}^2+k^2v^2}}{ix-\sqrt{-x^2+m_{1}^2+k^2v^2}}\\
&=\dfrac{\left(ix+\sqrt{-x^2+m_{2}^2+k^2v^2}\right)\cdot \left(ix-\sqrt{-x^2+m_{1}^2+k^2v^2}\right)}{m_1^2+k^2v^2}
\end{align*}
\begin{align*}
\left(kv+i m_2\right)\left(kv+i m_1\right)&=\left(ix+\sqrt{-x^2+m_{2}^2+k^2v^2}\right)\cdot \left(ix-\sqrt{-x^2+m_{1}^2+k^2v^2}\right)\\
&\vdots\\
&\text{etc.}
\end{align*}
... until you end up with ##1=1## or ##1=0##. If it was wrong, then very likely due to a confusion of ##m_1## and ##m_2## or a sign error.
 
  • Like
Likes thatboi and topsquark
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top