How Can I Self-Study Physics to a Bachelor's Level?

  • Thread starter Thread starter David Carroll
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around self-studying physics to achieve knowledge equivalent to a bachelor's degree. Participants explore the challenges of finding structured resources, particularly textbooks, and the importance of lab work in a comprehensive physics education.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant shares their experience of self-studying math using a structured list of courses and textbooks from the University of Michigan, expressing a desire to find a similar resource for physics.
  • Another participant references a featured thread that outlines steps to becoming a physicist, suggesting it may contain useful information.
  • A participant provides links to the University of Michigan's physics department resources, indicating where to find course descriptions and textbook lists, but notes that the information is not comprehensive.
  • There is acknowledgment of the importance of lab work in physics education, which the original poster recognizes will be missing in their self-study approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a specific list of textbooks or a structured path for self-studying physics, and multiple views on how to approach the topic are present.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in available resources for self-study, including the lack of detailed textbook lists and the challenge of replicating the lab experience in a self-directed study.

David Carroll
Messages
181
Reaction score
13
Hello, everyone.

A few months ago, I made the decision to give myself the knowledge equivalent to a bachelor's in math. I looked up the math courses at the University of Michigan's web-site. It gave a step-by-step list of courses with their associated text-books. So I am purchasing these associated text-books on-line and going through them myself. I'm almost done with the calculus textbook and then I go on to Linear Algebra, then Differential Equations, etc. etc.

More recently, I decided to do the same thing with physics. Thing is, when I went to U of M's physics courses, it was not helpful at all. It simply gave a very vague and flowery description of an education in physics (or at least, that's what it seemed like to me). I then tried other university's web-sites and none of them were helpful.

So my request is: Could someone kindly give me a step-by-step list of textbooks to study to give me the knowledge equivalent to a bachelor's degree in physics? Yes, I realize that an important aspect is lab work, so I acknowledge that that piece will be missing. But barring that, I really would like a list of textbooks, in order (say, from the 100's to the 400's and 500's), to acquire a good knowledge of physics.

I would appreciate any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We have a featured thread here by Zapperz on the steps to becoming a physicist. You might want to check it out.
 
Shukran, you akh!. Thank you, my brother.
 
David Carroll said:
Thing is, when I went to U of M's physics courses, it was not helpful at all. It simply gave a very vague and flowery description of an education in physics (or at least, that's what it seemed like to me).

http://www.lsa.umich.edu/physics/academics/undergraduateprogram/advising

On the above page, note the link to the Physics Undergraduate Handbook, which includes the major requirements and course descriptions. This doesn't list the textbooks used, though. For that, you have to go to

http://www.lsa.umich.edu/physics/academics/undergraduateprogram/courses

Open the "Class Schedule and Textbook List" tab, follow the link to the LSA Course Guide, and find the course(s) that you're interested in. When you click on a course, you'll see detailed information including the required textbook (if any). For example, for Physics 351, Methods of Theoretical Physics, I see Mathematical Methods for Physicists, by George B. Arfken et al. (Hey, that's the same book I used, in an earlier edition, when I took that course as a first-year grad student at U of M nearly forty years ago. :oldeek:)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sweet. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
9K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K