How Can I Solve This Mathematical Induction Problem?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a mathematical induction problem involving the inequality a^n - b^n <= n*(a^n-1)*(a-b). The original poster expresses difficulty in progressing with the inductive step after establishing the base case. Participants suggest that the inequality holds true under the assumption that both a and b are positive. They recommend using algebraic factorization and calculus to prove the inequality, highlighting that the approach varies depending on the relationship between a and b. The conversation emphasizes the importance of assumptions in mathematical proofs and offers alternative methods to tackle the problem.
eric34
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello folks, I have an induction problem that I have been working on, and I am at my wit's end. If anybody could provide me with a nudge in the correct direction, I would greatly appreciate it. I have attempted to factor out a number of terms to find something remotely intuitive here to present and I just cannot find anything. I've managed to come up with (n+1) > a, though I'm not certain that will even help me. The problem is below.

a^n - b^n <= n*(a^n-1)*(a-b) hypothesis

I used p(1) for a basis step. for the inductive step of p(k+1) I'm really at a loss here. Any thoughts on how I may tackle this, whatsoever, will be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can first prove that \(a^n-b^n=\left(\sum_{i=1}^na^{n-i}b^{i-1}\right)(a-b)\). This can be proved directly by induction or, as explained here, from the formula for the sum of geometric progression \(\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}x^{k}= \frac{1 - x^n}{1-x}\), which can be proved by induction.
 
eric34 said:
Hello folks, I have an induction problem that I have been working on, and I am at my wit's end. If anybody could provide me with a nudge in the correct direction, I would greatly appreciate it. I have attempted to factor out a number of terms to find something remotely intuitive here to present and I just cannot find anything. I've managed to come up with (n+1) > a, though I'm not certain that will even help me. The problem is below.

a^n - b^n <= n*(a^n-1)*(a-b) hypothesis

I used p(1) for a basis step. for the inductive step of p(k+1) I'm really at a loss here. Any thoughts on how I may tackle this, whatsoever, will be appreciated.
Hi Eric34, and welcome to MHB.

For the inequality $a^n - b^n \leqslant na^{n-1}(a-b)$ to be true, I think you will have to assume that $a$ and $b$ are positive. The inequality can go wrong if $a$ or $b$ is allowed to be negative.

If you assume that $a\geqslant0$ and $b\geqslant0$, then the inequality is true. But I don't see how to prove it by using induction.

To prove it using algebra, you can factorise $a^n - b^n$ as $$a^n - b^n = (a-b)(a^{n-1}+a^{n-2}b+a^{n-3}b^2 + \ldots + b^{n-1}).$$ If $b\leqslant a$ then $a^{n-1}+a^{n-2}b+a^{n-3}b^2 + \ldots + b^{n-1} \leqslant na^{n-1}$, and so $a^n - b^n \leqslant na^{n-1}(a-b)$. On the other hand, if $a\leqslant b$ then $a^{n-1}+a^{n-2}b+a^{n-3}b^2 + \ldots + b^{n-1} \geqslant na^{n-1}$. Multiplying by $a-b$ (which is negative) changes the sign of the inequality so again we get $a^n - b^n \leqslant na^{n-1}(a-b)$.

To prove the inequality using calculus, divide both sides by $b^n$ and write $x=a/b$. The inequality then becomes $x^n-1\leqslant nx^{n-1}(x-1)$, or $(n-1)x^n - nx^{n-1}+1 \geqslant0.$ You can check that, for $x>0$, the function $f(x) = (n-1)x^n - nx^{n-1}+1$ has a minimum value of 0, when $x=1$, and is therefore positive for all other positive values of $x$.
 
First trick I learned this one a long time ago and have used it to entertain and amuse young kids. Ask your friend to write down a three-digit number without showing it to you. Then ask him or her to rearrange the digits to form a new three-digit number. After that, write whichever is the larger number above the other number, and then subtract the smaller from the larger, making sure that you don't see any of the numbers. Then ask the young "victim" to tell you any two of the digits of the...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K