How can logarithms be used to simplify inverse hyperbolic functions?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter The_ArtofScience
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integrate
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the function sec^3(x) and the relationship between the resulting expressions and inverse hyperbolic functions, particularly focusing on how logarithms can be utilized in this context. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and integration techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the integration of sec^3(x) and its connection to inverse hyperbolic functions, seeking clarification.
  • Another participant suggests using integration by parts and the identity sec^2(x) = tan^2(x) + 1 as a method for integration.
  • A participant notes that their method leads to a result involving logarithms but is interested in obtaining an expression that includes an inverse hyperbolic function, referencing a specific result from Wolfram.
  • One participant provides a link to the Wolfram result, which includes an expression with tanh^-1(tan(x/2)).
  • A later reply explains that inverse hyperbolic functions can be expressed in terms of logarithms, specifically mentioning the formula for artanh(x) and suggesting that manipulating logarithms may yield the desired inverse hyperbolic function.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the integration method or the relationship between the logarithmic expressions and the inverse hyperbolic functions. Multiple approaches and interpretations are presented without resolution.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the integration steps and the specific conditions under which the inverse hyperbolic functions relate to the logarithmic forms. The discussion does not clarify all assumptions or dependencies on definitions.

The_ArtofScience
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
This is not homework, but I'm just wondering, how do you integrate this deceptive looking integrand to get what Wolfram has?

I don't get why the answer has an inverse hyperbolic function. Please teach me!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]\int sec^3xdx = \int secx (sec^2x dx)[/tex]

Integration by parts and then use the identity [itex]sec^2x=tan^2x+1[/itex]
 
That method leads to (1/2)sec(x)tan(x) + (1/2)ln(sec(x) + tan(x)) + C. I am interested in getting an inverse hyperbolic function as displayed on Wolfram.

I do not know how inverse hyperbolic functions are related to integrals. The only success I've had was integrating sec(x) into 2tanh^-1(tan(x/2))
 
Maybe you should post what wolfram got?
 
Inverse hyperbolic functions can be written in terms of logarithms. In particular,

[tex]\operatorname{artanh}(x) = \frac{1}{2}\ln\left(\frac{1+x}{1-x}\right)[/tex]

So playing around with your logarithm you can probably get the artanh function they give out. (You may need to add a constant to your result to get to theirs).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K