How Can the Distance Between Two Points Exceed the Size of the Universe?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter LoudAmp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measuring Universe
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the size and shape of the universe, particularly focusing on the implications of distances between points in cosmology. Participants explore concepts related to the observable universe, the particle horizon, and the nature of cosmic distances.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether they are mistakenly treating the particle horizon as the radius of the universe, leading to confusion about distances exceeding the universe's size.
  • Another participant suggests that the universe may be infinite in size and flat in shape, indicating that distances can exceed the observable universe without contradiction.
  • Several participants discuss the analogy of measuring distances on the surface of the Earth to illustrate the complexities of cosmic distances.
  • A participant describes how observing distant objects reveals their past positions, complicating the understanding of current distances due to cosmic expansion.
  • Another participant emphasizes the difference between the observable universe's age and the concept of a physical edge, suggesting that the observable universe does not have a definitive size.
  • One participant expresses that the question of distances in cosmology is reasonable and compares it to practical questions about distances in everyday life.
  • Another participant acknowledges the challenge of simplifying complex cosmological concepts for laypersons.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the universe's size and shape, with no consensus reached on the implications of distances exceeding the observable universe. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the interpretation of these distances.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding due to the complexities of cosmic expansion, the nature of observable distances, and the potential confusion arising from analogies with finite surfaces like the Earth.

LoudAmp
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I’m learning about cosmology and I’m struggling understanding the size and shape of the universe.

If the universe has a radius of approximately ~46 billion light years, then the maximum distance between any two points in the universe today is ~92 light years. It follows then, that if I am standing at Point A and Point B is ~46 billion light years away, while Point C is ~46 billion light years in the exact opposite direction of Point B, then the distance of B to C would be ~92 billion light years. However, if my friend is standing at Point C, then they would measure Point A at ~46 billion light years away and Point D in the opposite direction of Point A at ~46 billion light years away. Thus, the distance from A to D would be ~138 light years, making it longer than diameter/length of the universe. How can the distance of A to D, exceed the size of the universe?

Am I making the mistake of treating particle horizon as the radius of the universe?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The simplest answer is: we don't know the size and shape.

That said, current best guess is that it's infinite in size and flat in shape. So let's go with that for the moment.

That figure of 46 billion light years is the radius of the observable universe.

The distance of A to D exceeds the size of the observable universe, and that's fine. There's a lot of room in an infinite universe!
 
Last edited:
LoudAmp said:
I’m learning about cosmology and I’m struggling understanding the size and shape of the universe.

If the universe has a radius of approximately ~46 billion light years, then the maximum distance between any two points in the universe today is ~92 light years. It follows then, that if I am standing at Point A and Point B is ~46 billion light years away, while Point C is ~46 billion light years in the exact opposite direction of Point B, then the distance of B to C would be ~92 billion light years. However, if my friend is standing at Point C, then they would measure Point A at ~46 billion light years away and Point D in the opposite direction of Point A at ~46 billion light years away. Thus, the distance from A to D would be ~138 light years, making it longer than diameter/length of the universe. How can the distance of A to D, exceed the size of the universe?

Am I making the mistake of treating particle horizon as the radius of the universe?

Think of the same question on the surface of the Earth. There is a maximum distance between any two points on the Earth's surface.
 
LoudAmp said:
Am I making the mistake of treating particle horizon as the radius of the universe?
mal4mac said:
The simplest answer is: we don't know the size and shape.
Actually, the simplest answer is "yes". :-p
 
PeroK said:
Think of the same question on the surface of the Earth. There is a maximum distance between any two points on the Earth's surface.

What does this have to do with a flat, infinite universe?
 
As you look into the distant reaches of the universe, you see objects as they appeared in the past. Due to expansion, they are now more distant than they were when they emitted the light you now see. Finally, you see the CMB, which is a baby picture of the universe. For the layperson accustomed to rulers and such, the natural question is 'just how far away is that puppy?'. The scientist hesitates momentarily then says 'right now, about 46 billion light years'. The scientist could have quibbled and caveated a lengthy explanation of expansion, redshift and the Hubble flow, but, sensing the futility of such an effort, gave a ruler distance - despite realizing how inappropriate it is. It's like seeing a baby picture and asking 'how far away is that baby?'. The queried party might reply '46 miles' - all the while wondering what kind of question is that? The observable universe has an age, not a size or distance to some phantasmal 'edge'.
 
I think it's quite a reasonable question! It's like a ship appearing over the horizon and someone asking "How far away is the horizon, then?" It's perhaps less interesting than asking "How far away is the edge of the earth?", but it's still interesting, & perhaps useful, to know the furthest distance we can see from the shore.

It might even be useful to ask "How far is that baby?" Maybe you want to give the baby a birthday present and wondering whether to walk, drive or fly...

Anyway, jargon busting page here with nice animations of "Hubble flow", etc:

http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/cosmos/h/hubble+flow
 
Chronos said:
It's like seeing a baby picture and asking 'how far away is that baby?'. The queried party might reply '46 miles' - all the while wondering what kind of question is that? The observable universe has an age, not a size or distance to some phantasmal 'edge'.


Chronos - - you have a great way of explaining difficult concepts regarding cosmology in simple terms to a layman.
 
I do try to simplify things, probably too much at times.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
11K