How can the endless square root problem be solved?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical problem of solving the expression \(\sqrt{n+\sqrt{n+\sqrt{n+\sqrt{n+\cdots}}}}\) and proving its equivalence to the formula \(\frac{1\pm\sqrt{4n+1}}{2}\). Participants explore the implications of infinite nesting of square roots, convergence of sequences, and the derivation of quadratic equations related to the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the infinite nature of the square root problem and questions how it can yield a precise number.
  • Another participant suggests letting \(x=\sqrt{n+\sqrt{n+\sqrt{n+\cdots}}}\) and derives a quadratic equation \(x^2-n=x\), noting that convergence issues were not considered.
  • Several participants emphasize the importance of proving the convergence of the sequence \(\sqrt{n},\ \sqrt{n+\sqrt{n}},\ \sqrt{n+\sqrt{n+\sqrt{n}}},...\) before performing algebraic manipulations.
  • One participant mentions the need for a fixed point theorem to address convergence issues, while another expresses unfamiliarity with such theorems but acknowledges the need to prove convergence first.
  • A participant introduces a different expression, \(\sqrt{1 + \sqrt{2 + \sqrt{3 + \ldots}}}\), and notes that it lacks a known closed-form solution.
  • Further discussion includes methods for proving convergence, such as showing that a sequence is Cauchy or proving it is monotone and bounded.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the necessity of proving convergence before proceeding with algebraic manipulations. However, there are multiple competing views regarding the methods to establish convergence, such as the use of fixed point theorems versus monotonic sequence theorems.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the potential pitfalls of assuming convergence without proper justification, indicating that the sequence may not always be monotone or bounded, which complicates the proof of convergence.

Chirag B
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
I'm having a little bit of trouble figuring out how exactly to do this.

Prove that [itex]\sqrt{n+\sqrt{n+\sqrt{n+\sqrt{n+\sqrt{n+\cdots}}}}} = \frac{1\pm\sqrt{4n+1}}{2}[/itex].

How exactly does one go about doing this? I mean, I understand it goes on infinitely, but doesn't that create an infinitely large number? Why would the number be so precise?

Also, it appears to be the solution of a quadratic equation (with the [itex]\pm[/itex] and all). Is that an approach? If so, how does one derive such a quadratic equation?

I tried working backwards, but when I do, all I get is that [itex]\sqrt{n+\sqrt{n+\sqrt{n+\sqrt{n+\cdots}}}} = \frac{1\pm\sqrt{4n+1}}{2}[/itex].

There's one less [itex]n[/itex] in the square root, but I still end up getting the same equation. Can this process by repeated infinitely until I get [itex]\sqrt{n} = \frac{1\pm\sqrt{4n+1}}{2}[/itex]? But this isn't true! Can someone help me?

Any help would be gladly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's the trick:

Let [itex]x=\sqrt{n+\sqrt{n+\sqrt{n+...}}}[/itex]

Then [itex]x^2-n=\sqrt{n+\sqrt{n+\sqrt{n+...}}}[/itex]

So [itex]x^2-n=x[/itex].

This is a quadratic equation which you can solve.

Note, I did not take into consideration any convergence issues here.
 
Ah, that's a neat trick. So you would have to think a little outside of the square root, if you get what I mean. :-p

Thanks!
 
If you want to solve the problem carefully, you have to prove that the sequence
[itex]\sqrt{n},\ \sqrt{n+\sqrt{n}},\ \sqrt{n+\sqrt{n+\sqrt{n}}},...[/itex] converges before you can start doing algebraic manipulations

Otherwise you could have something like [itex]x=n+n+n+...[/itex], and get x=x+n. Since n is arbitrary we get that n=0 always, which isn't true, and the mistake was assuming that we had a number to begin with
 
Office_Shredder said:
If you want to solve the problem carefully, you have to prove that the sequence
[itex]\sqrt{n},\ \sqrt{n+\sqrt{n}},\ \sqrt{n+\sqrt{n+\sqrt{n}}},...[/itex] converges before you can start doing algebraic manipulations

Otherwise you could have something like [itex]x=n+n+n+...[/itex], and get x=x+n. Since n is arbitrary we get that n=0 always, which isn't true, and the mistake was assuming that we had a number to begin with
I think an appropriate fixed point theorem is what's needed to sort out the convergence issues.
 
lugita15 said:
I think an appropriate fixed point theorem is what's needed to sort out the convergence issues.

Unfortunately, I'm not familiar with Fixed Point Theorems. However, I am familiar with rudimentary sequences/series. Would I have to prove the convergence of the sequence as Office_Shredder has suggested, and only then use the formula that micromass gets? Thank you in advance.
 
Try this one instead:
[tex] \sqrt{1 + \sqrt{2 + \sqrt{3 + \ldots}}} = ?[/tex]

:smile:
 
How devious! That expression has no known closed-form.
 
Chirag B said:
Unfortunately, I'm not familiar with Fixed Point Theorems. However, I am familiar with rudimentary sequences/series. Would I have to prove the convergence of the sequence as Office_Shredder has suggested, and only then use the formula that micromass gets? Thank you in advance.

That's the standard procedure. Most examples where you get a simple polynomial for the limit wool converge because that's the point, but I have once or twice in real life scenarios seen sequences where you can find a" limit" but the sequence doesn't actually converge.

Typically you prove these converge by showing they're cauchy (hard), or by proving they're monotone and bounded (easier to prove if it's true)
 
  • #10
Office_Shredder said:
Typically you prove these converge by showing they're cauchy (hard), or by proving they're monotone and bounded (easier to prove if it's true)

So I would have to use the Monotonic Sequence Theorem, I take it?
 
  • #11
Chirag B said:
So I would have to use the Monotonic Sequence Theorem, I take it?
Yes, here you can use the fact that for real numbers, a monotone bounded sequence is convergent. But for general problems of this type, your sequence may not be monotone, so it's better to read up on fixed point theorems to prove convergence.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K