How can the Fierz Rearrangement Identity be proven for Weyl Fermions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fuchini
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Fierz rearrangement identity for Weyl Fermions, as stated in Martin's supersymmetry primer (Eq 2.20), is proven through index manipulation and the properties of antisymmetric tensors. The identity is expressed as \chi_\alpha(\xi\eta)=-\xi_\alpha(\eta\chi)-\eta_\alpha(\xi\chi). The proof involves demonstrating that (\xi_\alpha\eta^\beta+\eta_\alpha\xi^\beta)=-\delta^\beta_\alpha(\xi\eta) by utilizing the Jacobi identity of the epsilon tensors. This method effectively shows that the coefficients vanish, confirming the identity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Weyl Fermions and their properties
  • Familiarity with antisymmetric tensors and their index manipulation
  • Knowledge of the Jacobi identity in tensor algebra
  • Proficiency in supersymmetry concepts as outlined in Martin's primer
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of antisymmetric tensors in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the Jacobi identity and its applications in tensor calculus
  • Explore advanced topics in supersymmetry, focusing on Fierz identities
  • Review examples of index manipulation techniques in theoretical physics
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in quantum field theory, and researchers focusing on supersymmetry and fermionic identities.

fuchini
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have to prove the Fierz rearrengement identity for Weyl Fermions. Eq 2.20 in Martin's supersymmetry primer:

\chi_\alpha(\xi\eta)=-\xi_\alpha(\eta\chi)-\eta_\alpha(\chi\xi)

Homework Equations


We have that the antisimetric tensor raises and lowers indices.

The Attempt at a Solution


\chi_\alpha(\xi\eta)=-\xi_\alpha(\eta\chi)-\eta_\alpha(\chi\xi)=-\xi_\alpha(\eta\chi)-\eta_\alpha(\xi\chi)
\chi_\alpha(\xi\eta)=-\xi_\alpha(\eta^\beta\chi_\beta)-\eta_\alpha(\xi^\beta\chi_\beta)
\chi_\alpha(\xi\eta)=-\chi_\beta(\xi_\alpha\eta^\beta+\eta_\alpha\xi^\beta)

Now I need to prove that (\xi_\alpha\eta^\beta+\eta_\alpha\xi^\beta)=-\delta^\beta_\alpha(\xi\eta). Can anyone help me with this? Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Generally the way to prove these formulae is to manipulate indices so that you can write an expression as a sum of terms involving just epsilons and deltas multiplying the same expression of fermions. For example:

$$\begin{split} \xi_\alpha\eta^\beta+\eta_\alpha\xi^\beta +\delta^\beta_\alpha(\xi\eta) & = \epsilon_{\alpha\gamma} \xi^\gamma \eta^\beta + \epsilon_{\alpha\gamma} \eta^\gamma \xi^\beta + \delta^\beta_\alpha \epsilon_{\gamma\delta} \xi^\gamma\eta^\delta \\
&= (\epsilon_{\alpha\gamma} \delta^\beta_\delta - \epsilon_{\alpha\delta} \delta^\beta_\gamma + \delta^\beta_\alpha \epsilon_{\gamma\delta} ) \xi^\gamma\eta^\delta.\end{split}$$

We can then manipulate the coefficient to see that it vanishes due to the Jacobi identity

$$ \epsilon_{\alpha\beta} \epsilon_{\gamma\delta} + \epsilon_{\alpha\gamma} \epsilon_{\delta\beta} + \epsilon_{\alpha\delta} \epsilon_{\beta\gamma} =0.$$

We could have directly applied this method to the original Fierz formula.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K