How can the isomorphism of pullback bundles by homotopic maps be proven?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kakarukeys
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fibre
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the isomorphism of pullback bundles by homotopic maps in the context of fiber bundles. Chris Isham's reference to "Modern Differential Geometry for Physicists" highlights that while the proof is conceptually straightforward, practical execution can be complex due to non-unique isomorphisms. Key techniques involve using clutching data, homeomorphisms, and extension lemmas such as Urysohn's lemma. The conversation also references foundational texts like Atiyah's K-theory and Hatcher's Algebraic Topology for deeper understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fiber bundles and their properties
  • Familiarity with homotopy theory and isomorphisms
  • Knowledge of Urysohn's lemma and its applications
  • Basic concepts of differential geometry as outlined in "Modern Differential Geometry for Physicists"
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of clutching data in fiber bundles
  • Learn about Urysohn's lemma and its implications in topology
  • Explore Atiyah's K-theory for a comprehensive understanding of vector bundles
  • Review Hatcher's Algebraic Topology for insights into homotopy and fiber bundles
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in topology and differential geometry, as well as graduate students seeking to understand the intricacies of fiber bundles and their isomorphisms.

kakarukeys
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
Chris Isham said (Modern Differential Geometry for Physicists) it's fairly easy to show that the pullback bundles of a (locally trivial) fibre bundle by two homotopic maps are isomorphic. But I haven't had a clue. Can somebody tell me how to prove?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok I think I know how to do it. Its tricky because the isomorphism does not seem to be at all unique. that makes it not really stick out for you.

you have

an open cover by Ui, and on each overlap you have two clutching data, sij and tij, which are maps into the group of automorphisms of the fiber F.

then you need isomorphisms, i.e. homeomorphisms fi:Ui-->Ui, such that

on overlaps, sij o fj = fi o tij. so you take f1 to be anything, then you need f2 = sij^(-1) 0 f1 o tij on Ui meet Uj. so define it that way on Ui meet Uj and use an extension lemma like urysohn, to extend f2 to all of U2.

continue with f3,...

it seems compactness is needed. you could look it up in atiyah's book on k theory, or husemollers book on bundles, or steenrod, or any other book on bundles, like hatcher's algebraic topology, which is free online.
 
i seem to have neglected to make f2 a homeomorphism, simply by using any old extension in fact i can't understand any of it myself. what the heck is sij^(-1)?
 
here is a free reference that uses parallel transport to assign an isomorphism of pullbacks to a homotopy for principal fiber bundles.

http://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0105161
 
well i looked in bott tu p. 58 for the vector bundle case, and it is knid of like what i said.

one shows the isomorphism class of a bundle on YxI, restricted to Yx{0} cannot change locally near 0.

i.e. the homotopy gives a pull back bundle E on YxI, and we look at its restriction to Yx{0} and we just cross that restriction with I to get a family F of bundles on YxI, which have isomorphic restrictions to every Yxt.

So we have an isomorphism of these bundles E,F over 0 and want to extend the isomorphism say to Yxe where e is a small interval containing 0.

To do this view the isomorphism as a section defined over Yx{0}, of the subbundle Iso(E,F) of Hom(E,F).

Then since this last bundle has Eucklidean space fibers, we can extend, again by a Urysohn type lemma.

then near t=0 the section lies in Iso(E,F), and using compactness of Y and I we get our theorem over YxI.

It can be extended to paracompact Y. This argumenT uses that the bundle of isomorphisms of two vector bundies is itself a fiber bundle contained in a euclidean space bundle, which seems a little special for all fiber bundles..

to go further i guess we need to know your definition of a fiber bundle. but i will probably leave it here.
 
was this useful?
 
At my present level, I can't comprehend what you said. I have bookmarked this page, in future I will refer back to it. Thank you mathwonk, all I know now is that it's not fairly easy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
26K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
47K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K