How can the l1 norm of a linear function be maximized?

  • Thread starter Thread starter humbug
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Norm
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on maximizing the L1 norm of a linear function defined as z = c + Ax, where the goal is to optimize x to maximize the sum of absolute values of z. The user notes that traditional methods like the simplex algorithm are ineffective for this maximization. They suggest that the separating hyperplane theorem might be relevant but are unsure how to apply it. A proposed approach involves setting all but one element of x to zero, although this is only valid when c equals zero. The user also seeks clarification on handling cases where c is a constant vector and discusses the implications of convexity in relation to the bounds of x.
humbug
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Sorry if this is in the wrong section...first time and i couldn't see a convex analysis section.

I'm trying to find a good algorithm/theorem that will maximise the l1 norm (sum of absolute values) of a linear function. Namely, given a function z = c + Ax where z is (nx1), A is (nxm) and x is (mx1), what is the optimal way to choose x such that the sum of the absolute values of z are maximised (obviously x is bounded).

My problem scales really badly so its not feasible to just compute at the bounds of x and choose the biggest outcome. I've also found that the simplex algorithm cannot do it (it only works for minimising the l1 norm). I think the separating hyperplane theorem might be able to help but i can't really see how.

Any help/ideas would be greatly appreciated
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I think this will work - just make all but one element of x equal to zero. With the position of the one nonzero element corresponding to the column of A which has the maximum L1 norm.

Edit : Ok scrub that, it's only correct for c=0.

BTW c is a vector (nx1) isn't it?
 
Last edited:
In general c is a vector (nx1), however one of my cases deals with c being a constant vector so any thoughts on how to deal with that would also be helpful. As I understand it, if each element of x is in the interval [a,b], then shouldn't x be populated with a and b only? I thought that since the abs function is convex then its maximum will lie at the bounds always (or in other words, the solution lies at the corner of some hypercube). You can use this argument to turn the problem into a binomial choice problem if that makes things easier (thats what I'm playing with at the moment but it hasn't made it easier for me yet)
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K