MHB How Can the Pigeonhole Principle Solve These Mathematical Puzzles?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Principle
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I have a few small questions, related to the pigeonhole principle, which should be the guiding line for the solution. I had more, but solved the easier ones.

1) Prove that each series of 10 integer numbers has a sub-series of following numbers such that the sum of the sub-series is divisible by 10. For example: From 4,4,1,3,5,2,2,5,6,3 we can take 3,5,2

2) Prove that every choice of 5 points in a square with side equal to 2, has a couple of points that the distance between them is at most a square root of 2.

3) Prove that every choice of 5 points in a triangle that each of it's sides is 2, there is a couple of points that the distance between them is at most 1.

Thank you !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yankel said:
2) Prove that every choice of 5 points in a square with side equal to 2, has a couple of points that the distance between them is at most a square root of 2.

3) Prove that every choice of 5 points in a triangle that each of it's sides is 2, there is a couple of points that the distance between them is at most 1.
For 2), divide the square into four smaller squares with side $1$. Any two points in the same smaller square will be within distance $\sqrt2$ of each other.

Similar idea for 3). This time, divide the triangle into four smaller equilateral triangles with side $1$.

In each case, you can then use the pigeonhole principle to get two points in the same smaller region.
 
Yankel said:
1) Prove that each series of 10 integer numbers has a sub-series of following numbers such that the sum of the sub-series is divisible by 10.
Here the pigeons are sums of subsequences that start from the first number (there are 10 of them) and the holes are non-zero remainders when divided by 10 (there are 9 of those). If some "pigeon" is divisible by 10, then the claim is proved. Otherwise there exist two subsequences whose sums have the same remainders...
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top