How can we interpret the inverse matrix of a robot's arm?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Poetria
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Arm Matrices
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on interpreting the inverse matrix of a robot's arm, specifically the matrix M and its inverse M-1. The correct interpretation of the vector v is that increasing L by v1 and increasing θ by v2 results in the robot moving 0.2 units to the right and 0.1 units up. The participants confirm that the mathematical notation used in robotics is standardized, aiding in understanding the movement of robotic arms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix operations, specifically inverse matrices.
  • Familiarity with robotic kinematics and movement representation.
  • Knowledge of vector notation and its application in robotics.
  • Basic grasp of trigonometric concepts related to angles (θ).
NEXT STEPS
  • Study matrix algebra, focusing on calculating inverse matrices.
  • Research robotic kinematics, particularly the Denavit-Hartenberg convention.
  • Learn about vector transformations in robotics and their physical implications.
  • Explore simulation tools for robotic movement, such as ROS (Robot Operating System).
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for robotics engineers, students studying robotic systems, and anyone involved in programming or controlling robotic arms.

Poetria
Messages
267
Reaction score
42
Homework Statement
Let M be the matrix ##\begin{pmatrix}1&-1\\ 0&1\\\end{pmatrix}##. Suppose we move the controller slightly, such that ##\Delta L## increases by 0.2 and ##\Delta \theta## increases by 0.1 . This will move the robot's x and y coordinates by ##\Delta x## and ##\Delta y## respectively. Which of the following vectors closely approximates ##\begin{pmatrix} \Delta x \\ \Delta y \end{pmatrix}## ?
Relevant Equations
##M^{-1}\begin{pmatrix} 0.2 \\ 0.1 \end{pmatrix}##
##M \begin{pmatrix} 0.2 \\ 0.1\end{pmatrix}##
##\begin{pmatrix} 0.2 \\ 0.1 \end{pmatrix}##
If I understand this correctly, this is the right answer: ##M \begin{pmatrix} 0.2\\ 0.1\end{pmatrix}##

There is an inverse matrix in the next question:
Continuing with the previous problem, let ##\vec v = M^{-1} \begin{pmatrix} 0.2\\ 0.1\end{pmatrix}##, where ##M^{-1}## is the inverse matrix of M . Let ##\vec v_1## and ##\vec v_2## be the components of ##\vec v## . Which of the following is the correct interpretation for ##\vec v##?

I think this may be the right answer:
If we increase L by ##\vec v_1## and increase ##\theta## by ##\vec v_2## , then the robot will move 0.2 to the right and 0.1 up.

At first I thought the following choice was correct:
If we increase L by 0.2 and increase ##\theta## by 0.1 , then the robot will move ##\vec v_1## to the right and ##\vec v_2## up.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Is the mathematical notation of a robotic arm so standardized that we are supposed to know what all this means? I don't.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Poetria
Sorry, I should have sent an image.
 

Attachments

  • robotcontroller.jpg
    robotcontroller.jpg
    15 KB · Views: 181
Or is my question silly? :(
 
Poetria said:
Or is my question silly? :(
Anyway I got it right. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K