Minimum distance between balls connected by rods

  • Thread starter Thread starter etotheipi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balls Minimum
etotheipi
Homework Statement
Three balls (A,B,C) are connected in series by two light rods of length ##l##, with B in the middle. All hinges are smooth. The three balls initially lie along a straight line, and an impulse delivers a speed ##v## to the ball A, perpendicular to the rods. Determine the minimum distance between the balls A and C.
Relevant Equations
N/A
I defined the angle ##\beta## as the angle from the right horizontal to the ball C, from B, and ##\alpha## as the angle from the left horizontal to the ball A, from B. I also work in the CM frame, which has a velocity downwards of magnitude ##\frac{v}{3}## w.r.t. the lab frame. The positions of the three balls in the CM frame are as follows $$\vec{r}_B = \begin{pmatrix}x\\y\end{pmatrix}$$ $$\vec{r}_A = \vec{r}_B - l\begin{pmatrix}\cos{\alpha}\\\sin{\alpha}\end{pmatrix}$$ $$\vec{r}_C = \vec{r}_B + l\begin{pmatrix}\cos{\beta}\\\sin{\beta}\end{pmatrix}$$From that I conserved momentum and angular momentum in the CM frame, respectively below:$$3m\vec{v}_B + ml\dot{\beta} \begin{pmatrix}-\sin{\beta}\\\cos{\beta}\end{pmatrix} + ml\dot{\alpha} \begin{pmatrix}\sin{\alpha}\\\ -\cos{\alpha}\end{pmatrix} = \vec{0}$$ $$3\vec{L}_B + ml \left[\begin{pmatrix}\cos{\beta} - \cos{\alpha}\\\sin{\beta} - \sin{\alpha} \\0\end{pmatrix} \right] \times \vec{v}_B + ml\vec{r}_B \times \left[ \dot{\beta} \begin{pmatrix}-\sin{\beta}\\\cos{\beta}\\0\end{pmatrix} + \dot{\alpha} \begin{pmatrix}-\sin{\alpha}\\\cos{\alpha}\\0\end{pmatrix} \right] + ml^2(\dot{\alpha} + \dot{\beta})\hat{z} = mlv \hat{z}$$ If we left multiply the COM equation by ##\vec{r}_B## then we can substitute the ##\vec{0}## into the COAM equation to obtain$$\begin{pmatrix}\cos{\beta} - \cos{\alpha}\\ \sin{\beta} - \sin{\alpha}\\0\end{pmatrix} \times \vec{v}_B + l(\dot{\alpha} + \dot{\beta})\hat{z} = v\hat{z}$$But I don't know what to do next. The distance between them is ##s = l\sqrt{2+2\cos{(\alpha - \beta})}##, so it is required to determine the most negative value of ##\cos{(\alpha - \beta)}##. Maybe it will also be necessary to use the centre of mass condition somewhere, which provides an extra constraint:$$3m\vec{r}_B + ml \begin{pmatrix}\cos{\beta} - \cos{\alpha}\\\sin{\beta}-\sin{\alpha}\\0\end{pmatrix} = \vec{0}$$I wondered if anyone could help out, thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
on Phys.org
If I solve the very last equation for ##\vec{r}_B##, differentiate for ##\vec{v}_B## and insert that into the second last equation, I can determine a further equation in terms of only the variables ##\alpha## and ##\beta##.$$\frac{2l}{3}(\dot{\alpha} + \dot{\beta}) - \frac{l}{3}(\dot{\beta} \cos{(\alpha + \beta)} - \dot{\alpha} \cos{(\alpha - \beta)}) = v$$Assuming I have done the algebra right, now it is required to find the minimum value of ##\cos{(\alpha - \beta)}##.
 
Though I have not completed it yet, take a look at my calculation attached to check your try.
 

Attachments

  • img20200706_00063962.png
    img20200706_00063962.png
    94.7 KB · Views: 248
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
anuttarasammyak said:
Though I have not completed it yet, take a look at my calculation attached to check your try.

Yes I think I get the same. We have defined ##\alpha## slightly differently (for instance mine takes ##\alpha = 0## at ##t=0## whilst you do ##\alpha = \pi## at ##t=0##) however this is an arbitrary choice and as far as I could tell our calculations were the same :smile:.
 
good task for the Lagrange–d'Alembert principle
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
@etotheipi thanks for investigation. Energy conservation
[tex]\dot{\alpha}^2+\dot{\beta}^2-\dot{\alpha}\dot{\beta}cos(\alpha-\beta)=\frac{v^2}{l^2}[/tex]
where ##\alpha## is my way in post #3. Is it helpful ?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
anuttarasammyak said:
@etotheipi thanks for investigation. Energy conservation
[tex]\dot{\alpha}^2+\dot{\beta}^2-\dot{\alpha}\dot{\beta}cos(\alpha-\beta)=\frac{v^2}{l^2}[/tex]
where ##\alpha## is my way in post #3. Is it helpful ?

Thanks for your help, it could well be useful :smile:. I am going to sleep now but I'll have a closer look tomorrow morning!
 
Formula of angular momentum conservation :
[tex](2-cos(\alpha-\beta))(\dot{\alpha}+\dot{\beta})=3\frac{v}{l}[/tex]
initial conditions at t=0 :
[tex]\alpha=\pi,\ \beta=0,\ \dot{\alpha}=\frac{v}{l}, \ \dot{\beta}=0[/tex]

We expect
[tex]\dot{\alpha}=\dot{\beta}[/tex]
when A and C take minimum distance. Otherwise the distance keeps increasing or decreasing. From energy and angular momentum conservation equations we get
[tex]\dot{\alpha}=\dot{\beta}=\frac{2v}{3l}[/tex] and
[tex]cos(\alpha-\beta)=-\frac{1}{4}[/tex]
which does not depend on v.

As for max, ##\alpha-\beta=\pi##,
[tex]\dot{\alpha},\dot{\beta}=\frac{v}{l},0[/tex]
For maximum two angular velocities do not have to coincident because ##(cos\theta)'=sin\theta=0## there.

I will appreciate your check and advice.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
I think that looks good, the only thing I found was that I think the initial conditions in the CM frame will be ##\dot{\alpha}(t=0) = \frac{2v}{3l}## instead of ##\frac{v}{l}##, although this doesn't affect the answer.

If the angle between the rods is ##\phi = \alpha - \beta##, then for our closest distance case we will have ##\dot{\phi} = 0 \implies \dot{\alpha} - \dot{\beta} = 0 \implies \dot{\alpha} = \dot{\beta}##, as you have used.

So yes, I think you are correct :smile:, thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anuttarasammyak
  • #10
Actually no you are right, ##\dot{\alpha}(t=0) = \frac{v}{l}##, like you said. My bad!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anuttarasammyak

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K