- 2,726
- 6
Jimmy Snyder said:How many Lebesgue measurable subsets of the reals are there?
i tried counting them, but i gave up after aleph-null...
Jimmy Snyder said:How many Lebesgue measurable subsets of the reals are there?
Jimmy Snyder said:How many Lebesgue measurable subsets of the reals are there?
This is close, but I am looking for subsets of the reals. So, set k to 1 and you have shown that lower limit is at least 2c. Now just provide an upper limit.pwsnafu said:I just came across this:
Let C be the Cantor set and [itex]E = C \times [0,1]^{k-1} \subset R^k[/itex]. Then E is uncountable with cardinality c and with Lebesgue measure zero. So there are 2c subsets of E, each Lebesgue measurable.
Jimmy Snyder said:This is close, but I am looking for subsets of the reals. So, set k to 1 and you have shown that lower limit is at least 2c. Now just provide an upper limit.
Yes, you have solved it.LCKurtz said:But isn't the cardinality of all subsets of the reals ##2^c##, so that is also an upper limit?
godsaveme said:Only a few were left in the tree? Live or die?
DaveC426913 said:What??
Sorry, I cannot parse those sentence fragments.
jgutierrez218 said:...a few is generally equated to mean 5.
Jimmy Snyder said:2 is a couple. 3 is a crowd. 3 to 7 is a few. 5 to 10 is some. 8 to 15 is several. 15 to 37 is a bunch or if it is something you don't like, then it's many, or even too many if you really don't like it. 30 - 100 is a profusion. 100 - 1000 is a multitude. More than that is a plethora or a surfeit.
jgutierrez218 said:I don't think you can answer questions like that.
There are two birds to begin with, one is shot dead. 1 is left.
1 does not equal a few, as a few is generally equated to mean 5.