MHB How can we use the $PA=LU$ decomposition to solve a system of linear equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris L T521
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a system of linear equations using the $PA=LU$ decomposition method. Participants are tasked with finding the decomposition for the given matrix and then using it to solve a specific equation. The matrix provided is $A=\begin{pmatrix}2 & 1 & 5\\ 4 & 4 & -4\\ 1 & 3 & 1\end{pmatrix}$. A hint is provided for the second part of the problem, and Sudharaka is acknowledged for correctly answering the problem. The thread emphasizes the application of $PA=LU$ decomposition in practical problem-solving.
Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
913
Reaction score
0
Thanks to those who participated in last week's POTW! Here's this week's problem!

-----

Problem: Given the matrix $A=\begin{pmatrix}2 & 1 & 5\\ 4 & 4 & -4\\ 1 & 3 & 1\end{pmatrix}$,

(a) Find it's $PA=LU$ decomposition where $P$ is a permutation matrix, $L$ is a lower triangular matrix, and $U$ is an upper triangular matrix.
(b) Use its $PA=LU$ decomposition to solve $\begin{pmatrix}2 & 1 & 5\\ 4 & 4 & -4\\ 1 & 3 & 1\end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 5 \\ 0 \\ 6 \end{pmatrix}$

Hint for (b):
Solve the matrix equations $Lc=Pb$ and $Ux=c$ and then use back substitution.

-----

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry about posting the solution late - I was studying for my analysis prelim this past week and did some more cramming last night, and in the process I forgot about updating the POTWs for this week. The exam was this morning and was much better than what I was expecting - I'll know how well I did in the next couple weeks.

Anyways, this week's problem was correctly answered by Sudharaka. His solution can be found below.

The LUP decomposition is not unique. One possible answer is,

\[\begin{pmatrix}0& 1& 0\\0& 0& 1\\1& 0& 0\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}2 & 1 & 5\\ 4 & 4 & -4\\ 1 & 3 & 1\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}1&0&0\\ 0.25& 1& 0\\ 0.5& -0.5& 1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} 4& 4& -4\\ 0& 2& 2\\ 0& 0& 8\end{pmatrix}\]\[\Rightarrow\begin{pmatrix}2 & 1 & 5\\ 4 & 4 & -4\\ 1 & 3 & 1\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}0& 1& 0\\0& 0& 1\\1& 0& 0\end{pmatrix}^{-1}\begin{pmatrix}1&0&0\\ 0.25& 1& 0\\ 0.5& -0.5& 1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} 4& 4& -4\\ 0& 2& 2\\ 0& 0& 8\end{pmatrix}\]Therefore,\[\begin{pmatrix}0& 1& 0\\0& 0& 1\\1& 0& 0\end{pmatrix}^{-1}\begin{pmatrix} a_1 \\ a_2 \\ a_3 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 5 \\ 0 \\ 6 \end{pmatrix}\]\[\Rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} a_1 \\ a_2 \\ a_3 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}0& 1& 0\\0& 0& 1\\1& 0& 0\end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 5 \\ 0 \\ 6 \end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 6 \\ 5 \end{pmatrix}\]Now, \[\begin{pmatrix}1&0&0\\ 0.25& 1& 0\\ 0.5& -0.5& 1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} b_1\\b_2\\b_3\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 6 \\ 5 \end{pmatrix}\]\[\Rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} b_1\\b_2\\b_3\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} 0\\6\\8\end{pmatrix}\]Again we have,\[\begin{pmatrix} 4& 4& -4\\ 0& 2& 2\\ 0& 0& 8\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} x_1\\x_2\\x_3\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 6 \\ 8 \end{pmatrix}\]\[\Rightarrow \begin{pmatrix} x_1\\x_2\\x_3\end{pmatrix}= \begin{pmatrix} -1\\2\\1\end{pmatrix}\]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K