MHB How Can You Prove a Quadratic with No Real Roots Satisfies the Inequality?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the quadratic equation $(b+c)x^2+(a+c)x+a+b=0$, which has no real roots, satisfies the inequality $3a(a+b+c) \ge 4ac-b^2$. Participants engage in exploring various methods and approaches to demonstrate this relationship, emphasizing the conditions under which the quadratic has no real roots. The correct solution provided by castor28 is highlighted, showcasing a successful application of mathematical principles. The thread encourages further exploration of the problem and alternative solutions. Overall, it emphasizes the connection between the properties of quadratics and inequalities.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Here is this week's POTW:

-----

Given that the quadratic equation $(b+c)x^2+(a+c)x+a+b=0$ has no real roots. Prove that

$3a(a+b+c) \ge 4ac-b^2$

-----

Remember to read the https://mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to https://mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Congratulations to castor28 for his correct answer, which you can find below:
We must prove that, if
$$
(a+c)^2 - 4(b+c)(a+b) < 0
$$
then
$$
4ac-b^2 -3a(a+b+c) \le 0
$$
We note first that, if $b=0$, the first relation reduces to:
$$ a^2-2ac+c^2 = (a-c)^2 < 0$$
which is impossible; therefore $b\ne0$. Writing $a = bx$, $c=by$ and dividing by $b^2$, we obtain the inequalities:
\begin{align*}
f(x,y)&=x^2 - 2xy - 4x + y^2 - 4y - 4 < 0\\
g(x,y) &= x*y - 3*x - 3*x^2 - 1\le0
\end{align*}
and we must prove that $f(x,y)<0$ implies $g(x,y)\le0$. To that effect, we try to find a positive (or negative) definite linear combination of $f$ and $g$.

Expanding $f + kg$, we find:
$$
f(x,y) + kg(x,y) = (- 3k + 1)x^2 + (k - 2)xy + y^2 + (- 3k - 4)x - 4y - (k + 4)
$$
Looking at the second degree terms, we see that a necessary condition for the expression to be a square is:
$$
(k-2)^2 -4(1-3k) = k^2 + 8k = 0
$$
giving $k=0$ or $k=-8$. $k=0$ simply gives $f(x,y)$, which is not a square. On the other hand, with $k=-8$, we find:
\begin{align*}
f(x,y) - 8g(x,y) &= 25x^2 - 10xy + 20x + y^2 - 4y + 4\\
&= (5x - y + 2)^2\\
&\ge0
\end{align*}
This can be written as $8g(x,y) = f(x,y)-(5x - y + 2)^2$, and shows that $f(x,y)<0$ indeed implies $g(x,y)<0$; this is slightly stronger that what is required, since the inequality is strict.

There is a geometric interpretation of this: in the graph below, the first relation corresponds to the interior of the green parabola, and the second relation corresponds to the exterior of the red hyperbola. The statement expresses the fact that the former is included in the latter.

View attachment 8254

Alternate solution of other:
Adding $ax^2+bx+c$ into $(b+c)x^2+(a+c)x+a+b=0$, we get

$(a+b+c)(x^2+x+1)=ax^2+bx+c$

Let $f(x)=(a+b+c)(x^2+x+1)$ and $g(x)=ax^2+bx+c$ and thus $f(x)=g(x)$. Since both $f$ and $g$ are quadratic functions that will never intersect, we know we either have $f(x)>g(x)$ or $f(x)<g(x)$ for all $x$.

WLOG, assume that $a+b+c>0$. We then have $f(1)=3(a+b+c),\,g(1)=a+b+c$, which implies $f(x)>g(x)$ for all $x$. It follows that the minimum of $f$ is greater than the minimum of $g$ where $f_{\text{minimum}}=\dfrac{3}{4}(a+b+c)$.

If $a$ is positive, then $g_{\text{minimum}}=\dfrac{4ac-b^2}{4a}$ and so $\dfrac{3}{4}(a+b+c)>\dfrac{4ac-b^2}{4a}$, i.e. $3a(a+b+c)>4ac-b^2$.

If $a$ is negative, then $f_{\text{maximum}}\ge f(1)$ and we get $\dfrac{4ac-b^2}{4a}\ge a+b+c\ge \dfrac{3}{4}(a+b+c)$, i.e. $3a(a+b+c)>4ac-b^2$.

And the proof is then followed.
 

Attachments

  • 320s.png
    320s.png
    6.1 KB · Views: 116
Back
Top