MHB How can you simplify generated ideals in a commutative unital ring?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fermat1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ring
Click For Summary
In a commutative unital ring, the sum of two ideals is generated by the union of their generators. The discussion focuses on simplifying the ideal generated by specific polynomials, where common generators can be replaced by simpler forms through linear combinations. It is noted that if a generator can be expressed as a multiple of another, it can be omitted from the list. The characteristic of the ring affects whether certain scalars can be used to simplify generators, as not all rings allow for division by integers like 5. Ultimately, understanding these simplifications is crucial for effectively managing ideals in ring theory.
Fermat1
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
Let $x,y$ be members of a commutative unital ring. By using various 'rules' show that
$<y^4+3x^3-2x^2,7y^4+5(xy+yx^2),x^3+2y^3>+<x^3,xy^2,xy^3,yx^2,xy^2,y^4$>
$=<x^2,xy,y^3>$, where $<.>$ denotes the ideal generated by$.$

Can you tell me the rules for simplyifing these generated ideals (and I will complete the question)? My teacher went through them a while back but I lost my notes. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To start myself off, I have proved that $<xy>=<x><y>$ but $<x>+<y>$ contains $<x+y>$. Can anyone help with simplifying the expression?
 
Fermat said:
Let $x,y$ be members of a commutative unital ring. By using various 'rules' show that
$<y^4+3x^3-2x^2,7y^4+5(xy+yx^2),x^3+2y^3>+<x^3,xy^2,xy^3,yx^2,xy^2,y^4$>
$=<x^2,xy,y^3>$, where $<.>$ denotes the ideal generated by$.$

Can you tell me the rules for simplyifing these generated ideals (and I will complete the question)? My teacher went through them a while back but I lost my notes. Thanks
I don't know a list of rules for dealing with this, but there is one property that seems fairly obvious. Namely, if two ideals are given in terms of generators then their sum is given by the union of those generators: $\langle a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_m \rangle + \langle b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_n \rangle = \langle a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_m, b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_n \rangle.$ In this case, $$\begin{aligned}\langle y^4+3x^3-2x^2,&7y^4+5(xy+yx^2), x^3+2y^3 \rangle +\langle x^3,xy^2,xy^3,yx^2,xy^2,y^4 \rangle \\ &= \langle y^4+3x^3-2x^2, 7y^4+5(xy+yx^2),x^3+2y^3, x^3,xy^2,xy^3,yx^2,xy^2,y^4 \rangle .\end{aligned}$$ After that, you can reduce the number of generators by common sense methods. For example, the set of linear combinations of $x^3+2y^3$ and $x^3$ is the same as the set of linear combinations of $2y^3$ and $x^3.$ So you can simplify the list of generators by replacing $x^3+2y^3$ by $2y^3.$ Also, if $xy^2$ is a generator then $xy^3 = (xy^2)y$ is automatically in the ideal, so is not needed as a generator. In that way, you should be able to simplify the list of generators to $\langle -2x^2, 5xy, 2y^3, x^3,xy^2,yx^2,xy^2,y^4 \rangle .$

To get any further than that, I had to make the assumption that the ring has characteristic $0$ (or at least does not have characteristic $2$ or $5$). If so, then you can multiply the first three of the generators in that last set by scalars and replace them by $x^2$, $xy$ and $y^3$. the remaining generators in the list are then multiples of those three, which therefore form a complete list of generators for the ideal.
 
Opalg said:
I don't know a list of rules for dealing with this, but there is one property that seems fairly obvious. Namely, if two ideals are given in terms of generators then their sum is given by the union of those generators: $\langle a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_m \rangle + \langle b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_n \rangle = \langle a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_m, b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_n \rangle.$ In this case, $$\begin{aligned}\langle y^4+3x^3-2x^2,&7y^4+5(xy+yx^2), x^3+2y^3 \rangle +\langle x^3,xy^2,xy^3,yx^2,xy^2,y^4 \rangle \\ &= \langle y^4+3x^3-2x^2, 7y^4+5(xy+yx^2),x^3+2y^3, x^3,xy^2,xy^3,yx^2,xy^2,y^4 \rangle .\end{aligned}$$ After that, you can reduce the number of generators by common sense methods. For example, the set of linear combinations of $x^3+2y^3$ and $x^3$ is the same as the set of linear combinations of $2y^3$ and $x^3.$ So you can simplify the list of generators by replacing $x^3+2y^3$ by $2y^3.$ Also, if $xy^2$ is a generator then $xy^3 = (xy^2)y$ is automatically in the ideal, so is not needed as a generator. In that way, you should be able to simplify the list of generators to $\langle -2x^2, 5xy, 2y^3, x^3,xy^2,yx^2,xy^2,y^4 \rangle .$

To get any further than that, I had to make the assumption that the ring has characteristic $0$ (or at least does not have characteristic $2$ or $5$). If so, then you can multiply the first three of the generators in that last set by scalars and replace them by $x^2$, $xy$ and $y^3$. the remaining generators in the list are then multiples of those three, which therefore form a complete list of generators for the ideal.

Thanks. I don't understand the last part though. For example, $x^2$ can be generated by $5x^2$ simply by multiplying by $1/5$. What has it got to do with the characteristic?
 
Fermat said:
Thanks. I don't understand the last part though. For example, $x^2$ can be generated by $5x^2$ simply by multiplying by $1/5$. What has it got to do with the characteristic?
The problem is that $5$ may not have a reciprocal in the ring. For example, the ring of integers contains only whole numbers, not fractions. Come to think of it, that has nothing to do with the ring's characteristic, it's more basic than that.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K