How can you simplify generated ideals in a commutative unital ring?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fermat1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ring
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on simplifying generated ideals in a commutative unital ring, specifically the expression $+$, which simplifies to $$. Key rules include the property that the sum of two ideals is the union of their generators, and the ability to reduce generators through linear combinations and dependencies. The discussion also highlights the importance of the ring's characteristic in determining the validity of scalar multiplication for simplification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of commutative unital rings
  • Familiarity with ideals and their generators
  • Knowledge of linear combinations in algebra
  • Concept of ring characteristics and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of ideals in commutative rings
  • Learn about the structure of generated ideals in algebra
  • Explore the implications of ring characteristics on ideal generation
  • Investigate linear algebra techniques for simplifying algebraic expressions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, algebra students, and researchers focusing on ring theory, particularly those interested in simplifying algebraic structures and understanding the properties of ideals in commutative rings.

Fermat1
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
Let $x,y$ be members of a commutative unital ring. By using various 'rules' show that
$<y^4+3x^3-2x^2,7y^4+5(xy+yx^2),x^3+2y^3>+<x^3,xy^2,xy^3,yx^2,xy^2,y^4$>
$=<x^2,xy,y^3>$, where $<.>$ denotes the ideal generated by$.$

Can you tell me the rules for simplyifing these generated ideals (and I will complete the question)? My teacher went through them a while back but I lost my notes. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To start myself off, I have proved that $<xy>=<x><y>$ but $<x>+<y>$ contains $<x+y>$. Can anyone help with simplifying the expression?
 
Fermat said:
Let $x,y$ be members of a commutative unital ring. By using various 'rules' show that
$<y^4+3x^3-2x^2,7y^4+5(xy+yx^2),x^3+2y^3>+<x^3,xy^2,xy^3,yx^2,xy^2,y^4$>
$=<x^2,xy,y^3>$, where $<.>$ denotes the ideal generated by$.$

Can you tell me the rules for simplyifing these generated ideals (and I will complete the question)? My teacher went through them a while back but I lost my notes. Thanks
I don't know a list of rules for dealing with this, but there is one property that seems fairly obvious. Namely, if two ideals are given in terms of generators then their sum is given by the union of those generators: $\langle a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_m \rangle + \langle b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_n \rangle = \langle a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_m, b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_n \rangle.$ In this case, $$\begin{aligned}\langle y^4+3x^3-2x^2,&7y^4+5(xy+yx^2), x^3+2y^3 \rangle +\langle x^3,xy^2,xy^3,yx^2,xy^2,y^4 \rangle \\ &= \langle y^4+3x^3-2x^2, 7y^4+5(xy+yx^2),x^3+2y^3, x^3,xy^2,xy^3,yx^2,xy^2,y^4 \rangle .\end{aligned}$$ After that, you can reduce the number of generators by common sense methods. For example, the set of linear combinations of $x^3+2y^3$ and $x^3$ is the same as the set of linear combinations of $2y^3$ and $x^3.$ So you can simplify the list of generators by replacing $x^3+2y^3$ by $2y^3.$ Also, if $xy^2$ is a generator then $xy^3 = (xy^2)y$ is automatically in the ideal, so is not needed as a generator. In that way, you should be able to simplify the list of generators to $\langle -2x^2, 5xy, 2y^3, x^3,xy^2,yx^2,xy^2,y^4 \rangle .$

To get any further than that, I had to make the assumption that the ring has characteristic $0$ (or at least does not have characteristic $2$ or $5$). If so, then you can multiply the first three of the generators in that last set by scalars and replace them by $x^2$, $xy$ and $y^3$. the remaining generators in the list are then multiples of those three, which therefore form a complete list of generators for the ideal.
 
Opalg said:
I don't know a list of rules for dealing with this, but there is one property that seems fairly obvious. Namely, if two ideals are given in terms of generators then their sum is given by the union of those generators: $\langle a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_m \rangle + \langle b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_n \rangle = \langle a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_m, b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_n \rangle.$ In this case, $$\begin{aligned}\langle y^4+3x^3-2x^2,&7y^4+5(xy+yx^2), x^3+2y^3 \rangle +\langle x^3,xy^2,xy^3,yx^2,xy^2,y^4 \rangle \\ &= \langle y^4+3x^3-2x^2, 7y^4+5(xy+yx^2),x^3+2y^3, x^3,xy^2,xy^3,yx^2,xy^2,y^4 \rangle .\end{aligned}$$ After that, you can reduce the number of generators by common sense methods. For example, the set of linear combinations of $x^3+2y^3$ and $x^3$ is the same as the set of linear combinations of $2y^3$ and $x^3.$ So you can simplify the list of generators by replacing $x^3+2y^3$ by $2y^3.$ Also, if $xy^2$ is a generator then $xy^3 = (xy^2)y$ is automatically in the ideal, so is not needed as a generator. In that way, you should be able to simplify the list of generators to $\langle -2x^2, 5xy, 2y^3, x^3,xy^2,yx^2,xy^2,y^4 \rangle .$

To get any further than that, I had to make the assumption that the ring has characteristic $0$ (or at least does not have characteristic $2$ or $5$). If so, then you can multiply the first three of the generators in that last set by scalars and replace them by $x^2$, $xy$ and $y^3$. the remaining generators in the list are then multiples of those three, which therefore form a complete list of generators for the ideal.

Thanks. I don't understand the last part though. For example, $x^2$ can be generated by $5x^2$ simply by multiplying by $1/5$. What has it got to do with the characteristic?
 
Fermat said:
Thanks. I don't understand the last part though. For example, $x^2$ can be generated by $5x^2$ simply by multiplying by $1/5$. What has it got to do with the characteristic?
The problem is that $5$ may not have a reciprocal in the ring. For example, the ring of integers contains only whole numbers, not fractions. Come to think of it, that has nothing to do with the ring's characteristic, it's more basic than that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K