How can you simplify generated ideals in a commutative unital ring?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fermat1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ring
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around simplifying generated ideals in a commutative unital ring. Participants explore various properties and rules related to the generation and simplification of ideals, including specific examples and assumptions about the ring's characteristics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a specific ideal and asks for rules to simplify it, indicating a need for clarification on the topic.
  • Another participant states that the sum of two ideals can be expressed as the union of their generators, providing a mathematical formulation.
  • It is suggested that certain generators can be replaced by linear combinations, such as substituting $x^3 + 2y^3$ with $2y^3$.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of the ring's characteristic on the simplification process, particularly regarding the ability to multiply generators by scalars.
  • A participant questions the relevance of the ring's characteristic, noting that the existence of a reciprocal for certain numbers is more fundamental than the characteristic itself.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the rules for simplifying ideals, with some agreeing on certain properties while others raise questions about the implications of the ring's characteristic. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to simplification and the role of the ring's characteristics.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention assumptions about the ring's characteristic, particularly in relation to the existence of multiplicative inverses for certain elements. There is also a recognition of the complexity involved in simplifying ideals, which may depend on specific properties of the ring.

Fermat1
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
Let $x,y$ be members of a commutative unital ring. By using various 'rules' show that
$<y^4+3x^3-2x^2,7y^4+5(xy+yx^2),x^3+2y^3>+<x^3,xy^2,xy^3,yx^2,xy^2,y^4$>
$=<x^2,xy,y^3>$, where $<.>$ denotes the ideal generated by$.$

Can you tell me the rules for simplyifing these generated ideals (and I will complete the question)? My teacher went through them a while back but I lost my notes. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To start myself off, I have proved that $<xy>=<x><y>$ but $<x>+<y>$ contains $<x+y>$. Can anyone help with simplifying the expression?
 
Fermat said:
Let $x,y$ be members of a commutative unital ring. By using various 'rules' show that
$<y^4+3x^3-2x^2,7y^4+5(xy+yx^2),x^3+2y^3>+<x^3,xy^2,xy^3,yx^2,xy^2,y^4$>
$=<x^2,xy,y^3>$, where $<.>$ denotes the ideal generated by$.$

Can you tell me the rules for simplyifing these generated ideals (and I will complete the question)? My teacher went through them a while back but I lost my notes. Thanks
I don't know a list of rules for dealing with this, but there is one property that seems fairly obvious. Namely, if two ideals are given in terms of generators then their sum is given by the union of those generators: $\langle a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_m \rangle + \langle b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_n \rangle = \langle a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_m, b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_n \rangle.$ In this case, $$\begin{aligned}\langle y^4+3x^3-2x^2,&7y^4+5(xy+yx^2), x^3+2y^3 \rangle +\langle x^3,xy^2,xy^3,yx^2,xy^2,y^4 \rangle \\ &= \langle y^4+3x^3-2x^2, 7y^4+5(xy+yx^2),x^3+2y^3, x^3,xy^2,xy^3,yx^2,xy^2,y^4 \rangle .\end{aligned}$$ After that, you can reduce the number of generators by common sense methods. For example, the set of linear combinations of $x^3+2y^3$ and $x^3$ is the same as the set of linear combinations of $2y^3$ and $x^3.$ So you can simplify the list of generators by replacing $x^3+2y^3$ by $2y^3.$ Also, if $xy^2$ is a generator then $xy^3 = (xy^2)y$ is automatically in the ideal, so is not needed as a generator. In that way, you should be able to simplify the list of generators to $\langle -2x^2, 5xy, 2y^3, x^3,xy^2,yx^2,xy^2,y^4 \rangle .$

To get any further than that, I had to make the assumption that the ring has characteristic $0$ (or at least does not have characteristic $2$ or $5$). If so, then you can multiply the first three of the generators in that last set by scalars and replace them by $x^2$, $xy$ and $y^3$. the remaining generators in the list are then multiples of those three, which therefore form a complete list of generators for the ideal.
 
Opalg said:
I don't know a list of rules for dealing with this, but there is one property that seems fairly obvious. Namely, if two ideals are given in terms of generators then their sum is given by the union of those generators: $\langle a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_m \rangle + \langle b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_n \rangle = \langle a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_m, b_1, b_2, \ldots, b_n \rangle.$ In this case, $$\begin{aligned}\langle y^4+3x^3-2x^2,&7y^4+5(xy+yx^2), x^3+2y^3 \rangle +\langle x^3,xy^2,xy^3,yx^2,xy^2,y^4 \rangle \\ &= \langle y^4+3x^3-2x^2, 7y^4+5(xy+yx^2),x^3+2y^3, x^3,xy^2,xy^3,yx^2,xy^2,y^4 \rangle .\end{aligned}$$ After that, you can reduce the number of generators by common sense methods. For example, the set of linear combinations of $x^3+2y^3$ and $x^3$ is the same as the set of linear combinations of $2y^3$ and $x^3.$ So you can simplify the list of generators by replacing $x^3+2y^3$ by $2y^3.$ Also, if $xy^2$ is a generator then $xy^3 = (xy^2)y$ is automatically in the ideal, so is not needed as a generator. In that way, you should be able to simplify the list of generators to $\langle -2x^2, 5xy, 2y^3, x^3,xy^2,yx^2,xy^2,y^4 \rangle .$

To get any further than that, I had to make the assumption that the ring has characteristic $0$ (or at least does not have characteristic $2$ or $5$). If so, then you can multiply the first three of the generators in that last set by scalars and replace them by $x^2$, $xy$ and $y^3$. the remaining generators in the list are then multiples of those three, which therefore form a complete list of generators for the ideal.

Thanks. I don't understand the last part though. For example, $x^2$ can be generated by $5x^2$ simply by multiplying by $1/5$. What has it got to do with the characteristic?
 
Fermat said:
Thanks. I don't understand the last part though. For example, $x^2$ can be generated by $5x^2$ simply by multiplying by $1/5$. What has it got to do with the characteristic?
The problem is that $5$ may not have a reciprocal in the ring. For example, the ring of integers contains only whole numbers, not fractions. Come to think of it, that has nothing to do with the ring's characteristic, it's more basic than that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K