How Can You Solve an Integral with a 2nd Order Pole on the Real Axis?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The integral of the function (cos(b*x) - cos(a*x)) / (x^2) from -Infinity to Infinity evaluates to Pi*(a-b). The discussion highlights the challenges of integrating functions with a second-order pole on the real axis, specifically addressing the method of residues and the need to adapt techniques typically used for simple poles. The proposed solution involves contour integration and careful consideration of singularities, ultimately leading to the conclusion that the integral can be computed by separating real and imaginary parts and applying residue theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Complex analysis fundamentals, including contour integration
  • Understanding of residue theory and poles in complex functions
  • Familiarity with the properties of sine and cosine functions in integrals
  • Knowledge of integration techniques, particularly integration by parts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of residues in complex analysis
  • Learn about contour integration techniques for functions with higher-order poles
  • Explore examples of integrals involving sine and cosine functions with complex arguments
  • Investigate the implications of removable singularities in integrals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone involved in complex analysis or integral calculus, particularly those dealing with integrals that involve poles and residues.

gysush
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a complex analysis problem from Arfken.

Integrate[ (cos(b*x)-cos(a*x))/(x^2), {x, -Infinity, Infinity}]

and show that it is equal to Pi*(a-b)


Attempt:

I first look at a related problem (or one that I think is related).

=> f(x) = sin(x)/x
=> f(z) = sin(z)/z

For this problem I can look at P[Integral(f(z)dz)]

then...sin(z)/z = [exp(i*z) - exp(-i*z)]/2*i*z = Integral 1 - Integral 2

where Integral 1 is the +i and Integral 2 is -i => this determines if we should close our contour in the UHP or LHP

Then Integral 1 = P[exp(i*z)/2*i*z] = Pi*i*Res(f(0))

Res(f(0)) is simple to calculate => 1/2*i

Likewise, Integral 2 = P[exp(-i*z)/2*i*z] = -Pi*i*Res(f(0))

Then Integral 1 - 2 = Pi*i/2*i - (-Pi*i/2*i) = pi

Upon inspection of my original integral I realize I have a 2nd order pole on the axis instead of a simple pole. Prof said the above method is only valid for simple poles. I then examine my notes/boas/arfken/leia for an example of 2nd order pole on real axis as in this problem...but have not been successful.

One example that I see is of form f(cos,sin)/(x^2 - a^2) which has two simple poles at a and -a

Another is of the form f(cos,sin)/(x^2 + a^2) which has two simple poles at +/- ia
For this integral, do not need principal value. We can consider, i.e. sin/(x^2 + a^2)...and from there calculate Integral[exp(iz)/z)...and set it equal to sum of residues etc...then separate out im/real parts and math them on LHS and RHS.

I'm kinda lost on the problem that I originally posted...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try integrating by parts once to get an integrand with only a simple pole.
 
Thank you!
 
I'll give you a quick sketch. Perhaps you can go through it and fill in the details. Also, that's a removable singularity in the original problem. But how about considering the integral:

\int_C \frac{e^{iaz}-e^{ibz}}{z^2}dz

where C is the half-disc in the upper half-plane with an indentation around the now simple pole. We would then have:

\int_{-\infty}^0+\int_{\Gamma}+\int_{0}^{\infty}+\int_U=0 so that (after some justification):

\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}+\int_{\Gamma}=0

where the integral over U is the half-circle arc and gamma is the indentation at the origin and that is just -i\pi r

where:

r=\mathop\text{Res}_{z=0}\left\{\frac{e^{iaz}-e^{ibz}}{z^2}\right\}=i(a-b)

I'm assuming the sine terms drop out because they are odd but I've not gone through this carefully and the integral over the large semi-circle tends to zero but I've not checked that.

So assuming all that is ok, then we have:

\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}=-\pi(a-b)=\pi(b-a)

Note I'm getting a minus sign different from yours. You can look into that. I left out details that you can go through.
 
Yes, thank you as well. But the answer fell out almost trivially (since I already know Integral[sinx/x] once I did the integration by parts. Just had to make sure I took out the b or the a once I diff cos(ax)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
679
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K