How Close Can Alpha Particles Get to a Gold Nucleus in Rutherford's Experiment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fatboy12341
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Rutherford gold experiment, specifically focusing on the behavior of alpha particles as they approach a gold nucleus. The original poster is attempting to determine the closest distance an alpha particle can get to the nucleus, given its charge and kinetic energy, while expressing frustration over their calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of equations related to energy conservation and electric potential to find the distance of closest approach. There are questions about the necessity of knowing the distance between the alpha particle source and the gold sheet, as well as concerns about unit consistency in calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on the equations to use, while others have pointed out potential issues with the original poster's approach. There is an ongoing exploration of assumptions regarding initial distances and the implications for solving the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may lack sufficient information, specifically the distance between the alpha particle source and the gold sheet, which could affect the ability to solve for the closest approach distance.

fatboy12341
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
in a rutherford gold experiment, alpha particles with sharge +2e and a kinetic energy of 7.7 Mev were beamed at gold foil. the nuclius of a gold atom contains 79 protons, giving it a charge of +79e. What is the closest distance that an alpha particle can get to a gold nucleus when it approaches head on ?


ok i used the equation En=k^2 x e^4 me . Z^2
2xh^2 h^2


i am getting n^2= -9.07x10^21


i know this is wrong and am getting quite frustrated
if some on could help me it would be great
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You asked this question already and got an answer. If you don't understand what Andrew Mason said, you can ask him for further explanations. I for one, don't see how to find the solution without knowing the distance btw the gold sheet and the source of the alpha particles. :(
 
fatboy12341 said:
in a rutherford gold experiment, alpha particles with sharge +2e and a kinetic energy of 7.7 Mev were beamed at gold foil. the nuclius of a gold atom contains 79 protons, giving it a charge of +79e. What is the closest distance that an alpha particle can get to a gold nucleus when it approaches head on ?


ok i used the equation En=k^2 x e^4 me . Z^2
2xh^2 h^2


i am getting n^2= -9.07x10^21


i know this is wrong and am getting quite frustrated
if some on could help me it would be great
You know that the distance of closest approach is of the order of the radius of the Gold atom. The formula for the radius is (if you are aware of the derivation):
R = \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0}\frac{2Ze^2}{mv^2}

If you can see, the KE of the atom has been incorporated in this equation. You just have to substitute the required quantities to obtain the distance of closest approach. You can take it from here I hope...
 
i don't know but your possibly usingthe wrong units. (ie Joules instead of electron-volts) the solution is straight forward.

kinetic energy = electrical potential

Ke = that's given

Elec Pot = KQq/r

rearrange for r and make sure that k has the correct units.
 
I had forgotten about this thread. And since the OP appears to have abandonned it as well, I hereby claim possesion of it! :approve:

I don't see how the problem has a solution if we are not given the distance 'd' between the gold sheet and the alpha particle source because, if we take a coordinate system where the origin is on the gold sheet (x-axis perpenducular to it) the potential energy of the "alpha particle-fixed gold nucleus" system is

U(x)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0}{\frac{q_{\alpha}Q_{Au}}{x_{\alpha}}

The energy is a constant of the motion, hence for any two positions x_1 and x_2 of the alpha particle, we have

U(x_1)+K(x_1)=U(x_2)+K(x_2)[/itex]<br /> <br /> Taking x_1=d, the position just as the alpha particle leaves the source (where K=K_0=7.7 MeV) and x_2=x_m, the minimum distance between the alpha particle and the gold nucleus (where K=0), we have<br /> <br /> \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0}{\frac{q_{\alpha}Q_{Au}}{d}+K_0=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0}{\frac{q_{\alpha}Q_{Au}}{x_m}<br /> <br /> Solving for x_m requires the knowledge of the distance &#039;d&#039; btw the source and the gold sheet.
 
Last edited:
quasar987 said:
I had forgotten about this thread. And since the OP appears to have abandonned it as well, I hereby claim possesion of it! :approve:

I don't see how the problem has a solution if we are not given the distance 'd' between the gold sheet and the alpha particle source because, if we take a coordinate system where the origin is on the gold sheet (x-axis perpenducular to it) the potential energy of the "alpha particle-fixed gold nucleus" system is

U(x)=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0}{\frac{q_{\alpha}Q_{Au}}{x_{\alpha}}

The energy is a constant of the motion, hence for any two positions x_1 and x_2 of the alpha particle, we have

U(x_1)+K(x_1)=U(x_2)+K(x_2)[/itex]<br /> <br /> Taking x_1=d, the position just as the alpha particle leaves the source (where K=K_0=7.7 MeV) and x_2=x_m, the minimum distance between the alpha particle and the gold nucleus (where K=0), we have<br /> <br /> \frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0}{\frac{q_{\alpha}Q_{Au}}{d}+K_0=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0}{\frac{q_{\alpha}Q_{Au}}{x_m}<br /> <br /> Solving for x_m requires the knowledge of the distance &#039;d&#039; btw the source and the gold sheet.
<br /> <br /> I thought that in that kind of problem, it was implicitly assumed that the initial distance can be approximated to be infinite. In practice, if the energy is given at, say, a couple of meters from the gold nucleus, the initial potential energy will be completely negligible compared to th efinal potential energy (since the distance of approach is *much* smaller than a few meters).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
15K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K