The set of all possible streams of brain activity arising from all possible configurations of all possible neurons with all possible connections is finite, so if you accept that natural numbers are a creation of the human mind (brain), then don't you have to accept that the set of number is finite? When they start counting, mathematicians generally imagine the natural numbers as a platonic universe where objects are extended infinitely, but if thoughts about numbers are created by brain activity, and brain activity is finite, then every possible natural number and mathematical object imaginable from every direction with every one of thousands of subtle conscious factors is associated with a unique brain state, which is part of a larger finite set...unless we are wrong about physics and spacetime is truly continuous?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# How could the set oif natural numbers not be finite

Loading...

Similar Threads for natural numbers finite | Date |
---|---|

Nature: How many papers really end up without a single citation | Dec 16, 2017 |

Can People Catch Fire Naturally? | Dec 12, 2017 |

Are all new ideas evolutionary in their nature? | Feb 2, 2016 |

There exists or not exists a natural number | Apr 12, 2006 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**