How Could the Universe Be Smaller Than a Proton?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Himanshu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proton Universe
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the universe potentially being smaller than a proton in its early stages, exploring the implications of this idea and the reasoning behind it. Participants engage with both theoretical and intuitive aspects of cosmology, questioning the nature of the universe's origin and expansion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how scientists can assert that the universe was once smaller than a proton, expressing skepticism about the plausibility of such a conclusion given the vastness of the universe.
  • Another participant argues that physical observations strongly support the idea of the universe originating from a very small point, citing the expansion and cooling of matter and energy as evidence.
  • Some participants propose that the universe could have originated from a larger space, such as that of a solar system or a planet, rather than a point smaller than a proton, raising questions about the assumptions behind the Planck scale inference.
  • Concerns are raised about the need to explain the size of the universe at the time of the Big Bang if it were larger than a proton, suggesting that a smaller origin might be more logical.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the size of the universe at its origin, with some supporting the idea of a very small initial state while others suggest larger initial sizes are plausible. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need for further explanation regarding the assumptions made about the universe's size and the implications of its expansion, indicating that the discussion is limited by these unresolved questions.

Himanshu
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
How do scientists assert the daring conclusion, that is overwhelmingly impossible even to speculate about, that the entire universe that contains billions of galaxies with billions of stars in each one of them along with dark matter and dark energy that make up 95% of our universe was once in diststant past so small that is occupied a region of space that is smaller than the volume of a proton?


Now I agree that the size of the universe must have come from the calculation from the physical theories. But is there an intuitive understanding for this?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Hard as it is to conceive of the universe starting that way, the physical observations point very strongly in that direction.

All that matter and energy in the universe is flying apart at just the right speed, and coooling at just the right rate. If we switch the cosmic movie projector in reverse, and apply what we DO know about matter and energy, we see everything winding back to such a point.

The preponderance of evidence from different sources (such as Olber's Paradox, to name just one) leaves little room for other ideas about the origin of our universe.

You (i.e. you) could happily throw away all theories ever put forth and start from scratch, with only the observations. You would very likely come to the same conclusion about the origin of the universe.

It less about theories than it is about one virtually inescapable conclusion, the theories are more about refinement of the basic idea.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Hard as it is to conceive of the universe starting that way, the physical observations point very strongly in that direction.

All that matter and energy in the universe is flying apart at just the right speed, and coooling at just the right rate. If we switch the cosmic movie projector in reverse, and apply what we DO know about matter and energy, we see everything winding back to such a point.

but from what we are observing of the universe and its expansion, and considering the scale of these observations (zillions of lightyears), couldn't it be just as plausible that all of the universe "exploded" (i know that's the wrong word for this in the Big Bang) from a space as large as a solar system, or a star, or a planet, or a basketball? how do we infer that it goes back to the Planck scale (which is a fukuva lot smaller than a proton)?
 
rbj said:
couldn't it be just as plausible that all of the universe "exploded" (i know that's the wrong word for this in the Big Bang) from a space as large as a solar system, or a star, or a planet, or a basketball?
But then we would have to explain why it's that size, why it expanded from that point, and what it was like before that point.

Especially that last one. How did it get to be the size of a planet or a basketball and expanding rapidly? The most logical answer as to how it got to this size is that it was even smaller and expanded to that size. There's no reason in physics that prevents it from benig smaller than a basketball.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K