How did Max Planck derive his constant H?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Max Planck derived his constant 'h' in response to anomalies observed in blackbody radiation, specifically addressing the ultraviolet catastrophe through his formulation of Planck's Law. The seminal paper from 1906 is essential for understanding these concepts, with comprehensive discussions found in Darrigol's work, "From C-numbers to Q-numbers." A strong foundation in electrodynamics and statistical mechanics is crucial for grasping the implications of Planck's findings, which place him alongside other great physicists like Einstein and Newton. Recent discussions also highlight the relevance of 'h' in contemporary theories, including Zero Point Energy and the implications of a potentially decreasing speed of light.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Planck's Law
  • Familiarity with blackbody radiation concepts
  • Knowledge of electrodynamics
  • Background in statistical mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Darrigol's "From C-numbers to Q-numbers" for an in-depth understanding of blackbody radiation.
  • Study Planck's original 1906 paper to grasp the derivation of his constant 'h'.
  • Explore the implications of Zero Point Energy in modern physics.
  • Investigate the experimental data regarding the speed of light and its potential variations.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the historical development of quantum mechanics and its foundational principles.

Robert Miller
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I listened to a lecture the other day that some anomalies in observations compared to theory caused Max Plank to derive his famous Constant.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can somebody point me to a English summary of Max Plancks 1906 paper?

[Post moved to this thread by moderator]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Last edited:
The best complete source on this can be found in Darrigol (I will check spelling if this is incorrect.): From C-numbers to Q-numbers. Prepare yourself for a complete exposition of blackbody radiation. Your strengths better be in electrodynamics and statistical Mechanics. After you read this you will regard Planck to be mentioned in the same breath as Einstein, Newton or Boltzmann. If you have a hard time with the citation of the reference above, I will write back if necessary.
 
Well, you are really digging in. I suppose you found this one by Gearhart already ? I was impressed - both by the article that goes in depth and by the fact that it can be found so easily; Google really is a miracle.
 
I'm listening to a lecture by Barry Satterfield. It's long and painful to listen to due to so much background noise. The lecture is on Zero Point Energy. I don't have the math background, but I have a good head for the theoretical concepts. I've read this kind of stuff for many years. 20 years ago the ZPE seemed like fiction to me or at least not real. Now it seems to be on it's way to being a well developed field. I can't wait to see what the next 20 years uncovers in this field.

One major topic of this lecture was the experimental data that shows the speed of light is slowing, and that 'h' is needed so that (h*C) remains a constant. The value of 'h' increases as 'C' decreases at the same rate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
848
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K