How did Ted Kaczynski get away with it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stickythighs
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the circumstances surrounding Ted Kaczynski's ability to live undetected in a remote cabin in Montana for many years while conducting his bombing campaign. Participants explore various factors contributing to this situation, including local attitudes towards freedom, law enforcement priorities, and the geographical context of rural Montana.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the vastness of Montana and its rugged terrain may have led local authorities to overlook code violations related to living without electricity or running water.
  • Others argue that rural communities often have a live-and-let-live attitude, allowing individuals to live off the land without interference as long as they do not disturb others.
  • A participant mentions that Kaczynski's ability to avoid detection might have been influenced by the local culture, which may prioritize personal freedom over strict adherence to regulations.
  • Concerns are raised about whether law enforcement was focused on Kaczynski's activities during that time, with some speculating he could have had people paid off.
  • Another viewpoint highlights that while some rural areas may tolerate unconventional living arrangements, the presence of law enforcement has increased over time, making it harder for individuals to remain undetected.
  • One participant notes that Kaczynski's eventual capture was largely due to his brother recognizing his manifesto, suggesting that without this familial connection, he might have continued evading law enforcement.
  • There are references to the differences in societal norms and law enforcement practices between the late 1960s and early 2000s, indicating that perceptions of privacy and regulation have evolved.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views regarding the factors that allowed Kaczynski to live undetected, with no clear consensus on the primary reasons. Some emphasize local culture and geography, while others focus on law enforcement dynamics and societal changes over time.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the discussion is influenced by varying interpretations of local culture, law enforcement priorities, and the historical context of Kaczynski's actions. There are also references to changes in societal attitudes towards privacy and regulation over the decades.

stickythighs
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Kaczynski

"In the summer of 1969, Kaczynski moved to his parents' small residence in Lombard, Illinois. Two years later, in 1971, he moved into a remote cabin he built himself in Lincoln, Montana, where he lived a simple life on very little money, with no electricity and no running water, feeding himself as a hunter-gatherer. Kaczynski also worked odd jobs and received financial support from his family (including purchasing his land and, without their knowledge, funding his bombing campaign)." Kaczynski lived in this cabin with no electricity and no running water until he was arrested for murder in 1996.

Why didn't the authorities with code compliance in Lincoln, Montana evict or arrest Ted Kaczysnki for living in a cabin that didn't have electricity or running water?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Montana is:
Rather large
Covered in forest / mountains etc
Inhabitants have a certain 'robust' attitude to their idea of freedom

I'm guessing the local zoning authorities generally have more sense than to go off into the mountains looking for code violations.
 
mgb_phys said:
Montana is:
Rather large
Covered in forest / mountains etc
Inhabitants have a certain 'robust' attitude to their idea of freedom

I'm guessing the local zoning authorities generally have more sense than to go off into the mountains looking for code violations.

On my other thread, hypatia wrote the following: "Unless you buy 10,000 acres and build your cabin in the middle of it, they will find you. The one thing about rural communities, and the small towns near by, is that the people know pretty much know everything that's going on in what they consider their homeland. A stranger buys land...secretly builds a cabin, comes to town to buy gas{generator} and supplies, why the whole town would be talking about you in a matter of days."
 
Was this a big issued for law enforcement in those years?

he could have had people paid off as well.
 
JimmyJockstrap said:
Was this a big issued for law enforcement in those years?

he could have had people paid off as well.

Kaczysnki had to delay making bombs for months at a time several times because he didn't have the money to buy the parts for bombs or the money to buy bus tickets. These bomb parts were relatively inexpensive. We're talking a delay of months for, say, $500.

Kaczynski didn't have the money to bribe people.
 
How did Ted get away with it?

Population per square mile in Montana, 2006 census

6.2 people per square mile

Population in Greene County, MO, 2006 census

356.1 people per square mile

Go figure...

http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/30000.html

http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/29/29077.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Amish don't hook up.
 
stickythighs said:
why the whole town would be talking about you in a matter of days."
Yes, but they wouldn't tell the 'revenoo' men from the big city!
There are lots of books by people who have done this in Alaska/Yukon, I imagine the local authorities have the good sense, or lack the resources, to go treking miles into the woods to check you used the correct grade of timber in your cabin' roof trusses.
 
I went to collage in Colorado, started in 1973. I would take weeks off with some friends and hike into the wilderness and never see a soul.
In 2001, I went back for a visit. Hiked out with a small pack, 3 days hike into the wilderness I hear a loud voice. It says, "You are on private property, you must leave at once". I mean their is no one around, I start looking for signs of life, even looked up{I don't know at this point it might of been God}. But with in a hour, armed men showed up and escorted me the 2 day hike back to public land.
Nobody wants a Ted Kaczynski living in their backyard. Time has made a lot of difference, tho you might be able to find pockets in rural areas willing to put up with a hobo/survivalist, but the first time something goes amiss, they will come looking for you.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
There are wide variations in local culture about what is acceptable and what isn't.

I used to live in Alaska where there was a live-and-let-live attitude, especially outside of the main city (Anchorage). As long as you weren't bothering anyone, no one would bother you.

Want to go live off the land and not worry about regulations (or even laws, to some extent)? Tons of people - easily thousands - do it up there.

Be prepared to live a hard life, including the hardest winters you can image, though.
 
  • #11
hypatia said:
I went to collage in Colorado, started in 1973. I would take weeks off with some friends and hike into the wilderness and never see a soul. In 2001, I went back for a visit. Hiked out with a small pack, 3 days hike into the wilderness I hear a loud voice. It says, "You are on private property, you must leave at once". I mean their is no one around, I start looking for signs of life, even looked up{I don't know at this point it might of been God}. But with in a hour, armed men showed up and escorted me the 2 day hike back to public land.
Nobody wants a Ted Kaczynski living in their backyard. Time has made a lot of difference, tho you might be able to find pockets in rural areas willing to put up with a hobo/survivalist, but the first time something goes amiss, they will come looking for you.

the good old days
 
  • #12
Actually he is sitting in jail right now. He didn't get away with it. The system works.
 
  • #13
OMG Ted Kaczynski brought tribdog back!
 
  • #14
1969 isn't 2008. It's really that simple.
 
  • #15
Stickythighs, move to Montana and spend some time there and you will understand. You can build an outbuilding w/o electricity or water and live in it. They really cannot stop you. What can they do? Kick you out and force you to live without shelter? Get real. Sometimes I think people on this forum think remote means no public roads for only a mile or 2.
 
  • #16
Averagesupernova said:
Stickythighs, move to Montana and spend some time there and you will understand. You can build an outbuilding w/o electricity or water and live in it. They really cannot stop you. What can they do? Kick you out and force you to live without shelter? Get real. Sometimes I think people on this forum think remote means no public roads for only a mile or 2.
Thank you! You can do the same thing in unincorporated townships in Maine until you are caught, and then you have to pay up, same as anybody else. There are places here when you can hike for 7-8 hours a day and STILL not be really remote (as we residents might define that slippery word). I knew rangers and their families that I'd have to hike at least a couple of hours to visit. Getting deeper into forest would have required more.
 
  • #17
tribdog said:
Actually he is sitting in jail right now. He didn't get away with it. The system works.

He lived in that sad state for a couple of years and eventually disclosed his manifesto in the New York Times his brother recongized his manifesto and ratted him out ; he would have have not gotten caught without the help of the brother because the FBI had no leads on the case whatsoever until then including an adequate physical description of the suspect .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
8K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
12K
  • · Replies 133 ·
5
Replies
133
Views
28K