How Do Additional Springs and Dampers Affect Vibration Absorption?

  • Thread starter Thread starter foster182
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of adding additional springs and dampers on vibration absorption properties in a mechanical system. Participants explore the implications of these modifications in the context of oscillatory motion and damping behavior.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the potential outcomes of increasing the number of springs and dampers, considering how these changes might affect the system's effective spring constant and damping characteristics. Questions arise about deriving equations to model these effects and the implications of linear damping.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing insights and attempting to clarify their understanding of the system's behavior. Some have offered guidance on the mathematical modeling of the system, while others are still grappling with the concepts and seeking further clarification.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the need for clarity in the problem setup, as well as an acknowledgment of the original poster's learning stage. The discussion includes references to assumptions about the configuration of springs and dampers, as well as the nature of damping in oscillatory systems.

foster182
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I know some people might find this a stupid question but


200px-Mass_spring_damper.jpg


What effect would the addition of

1)additional springs
2)additional dampers

have on vibration absorption properties?

In plain English please, I’m only learning :biggrin:

thanks guys
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the forums foster182!

It is the policy of this forum that the poster has shown some attempt at doing the problem themselves. What do you think would happen in both the scenarios described?
 
well with the increase of a damper or additional spring it would absorb more vibration thus coming to a steady state. yes?

how would i derive an equation from that?
 
Well the addition of more springs (I assume they will be added in parallel from the diagram) will give the system an effective spring constant which is the sum of the spring constants of all the springs. What effect would that have on the system if the damping was kept the same?
 
sorry i should of made that more clear
200px-1.jpg


and with additional damper and spring

200px-Mass_spring_damper.jpg


the system will react differantly when i add the damper and spring separate than together etc, but i don't know how to derive an expression from it.
 
Oh so that picture was of the new system. Got it. Well like I said before the spring constant will be the sum of the spring constants of the two springs. What effect will that have of the vibration of this system? Now its also damped, what do you know of damping of oscillations?

Consider a cars suspension and what it has to do to make the ride bearable.
 
o.k. i think i have it now,
so in the case of me adding the damper to the existing spring

200px-Mass_spring_damperG.jpg


net force applied to ( mass m= F - kx - cv )

then to model that ( m d2x/dt2 = F- kx - c dx/dt ) taken v as velocity

something like that?

sorry i don't know much about damping of oscillations? i will read up on it.
 
Yeah, you're almost there:

[tex]m\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}+c\frac{dx}{dt}+kx=0[/tex]

is probably the standard form.

That of course does assume certain things about the damping force that means it can be approximated as linear.
 
yes it would be linear,
and if i was to add another spring

200px-Mass_spring_damper.jpg


m d2x/dt2 + c dx/dt + kx(2) = F

if the two springs have the same resistance

yes?

if not?
 
  • #10
Like I mentioned before the spring constants add together to give and effective spring constant.

[tex]m\frac{d^2x}{dt^2}+c\frac{dx}{dt}+(k_1+k_2)x=0[/tex]
 
  • #11
ah i see thank you!
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
87K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
8K