How do antiparticles behave in the presence of gravity?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the behavior of antiparticles in the presence of gravitational forces, exploring theoretical implications, distinctions between particles and antiparticles, and the nature of antimatter. It includes conceptual inquiries and speculative reasoning regarding the properties and interactions of antiparticles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that antiparticles have the same mass as their particle counterparts and are affected by gravity in the same way as normal particles.
  • Others argue that if antimatter were to repel itself gravitationally, it would imply that Majorana particles are unaffected by gravity, which is considered false.
  • One participant expresses confusion over the distinction between particles and antiparticles, questioning whether charge is the only difference and why protons are not considered antiparticles despite having positive charge.
  • Another participant clarifies that being an antiparticle involves more than just having opposite charge, noting that antiparticles have all intrinsic quantum numbers flipped in sign.
  • A later reply mentions that antiparticles do not have negative mass, emphasizing that their mass is positive.
  • There is a suggestion that discussions about experiments or thought experiments related to antimatter are often absent in these conversations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of antiparticles and their gravitational interactions, with no consensus reached on the fundamental distinctions or implications of these properties.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential misunderstandings regarding the properties of antiparticles, including mass and energy considerations, but do not resolve these issues. The discussion also touches on the concept of missing antimatter without reaching a definitive conclusion.

AlexPeltser
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Can someone tell how antiparticles affected by gravitational force? The same way as particles or opposite? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Antiparticles have the same mass as their particle counterparts. Antimatter theoretically attracts matter and antimatter particles in the same way that matter attracts matter.
 
If antimatter particles were to repel each other by gravitation, then all Majorana (neutral) particles would have to be unaffected by gravitation - what is proven false.
 
Ok, what is confusing to me is that the very name “antiparticle” sounds more important than it actually is. Antiparticles are made of ordinary matter and have ordinary mass affected by the gravitation the same way as “normal” particles. So the only difference between “normal” and “anti” is charge? That’s it? Electron and positron are the same in all but one property?
Then how do we even distinguish which particle is “normal” and which is “anti”? We can’t do it by charge’s sign because though electron has negative charge and positron has positive, we see other examples, namely, a proton has positive charge - then why don’t we call a proton an antiparticle?
Let me clarify. When a negative electron and a positive positron meet - they annihilate. Why then electron doesn’t annihilate when it meets a proton? The charges are opposite, and though proton has bigger mass, the annihilation must still take place. They are “anti” to each other.
And this reminds me of that problem of “missing antimatter”. By established theories, at the Big Bang there were equal amounts of matter and antimatter created. But we only see matter in our observable Universe. Now – returning to the definition of antimatter above – we can consider protons being “antimatter” and then the math might become valid again – antimatter is not missing if we sum all electrons as matter and all protons as antimatter.
Anyway, there must be an error somewhere in my thoughts. Can someone clarify what the antimatter is if not all those particles that charged positively? Thank you.
 
Being an anti-particle is far more involved then just having opposite charge. A particles anti-particle has all of its intrinsic quantum numbers flipped in sign. When a proton and electron meet, they will not annihilate, one is not the others anti-particle.
 
perhaps there is here a misunderstanding

an ANTIPARTICLE does NOT have NEGATIVE mass.. its mass is POSITIVE

another example would be particles with NEGATIVE ENERGY ¡¡ so its rest mass and so on becomes more and more NEGATIVE

in this case perhaps they would have anti gravitational properties ,
 
Whenever this subject comes up nobody references any experiments, any propsed experiments or any thought experiments.

There was previously talk about collecting anti-matter that occurs naturally in the Van Allen belt?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K