How do branes emerge in cyclic universe?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter beno23
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cyclic Universe
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the emergence of branes in the cyclic universe model, specifically addressing the ekpyrotic universe theory. It highlights that branes are considered to have always existed, with collisions between them resulting in big bangs every few trillion years. The conversation contrasts two models: one involving a collapsing fifth dimension and another, more favorable model, where a third "bulk brane" spontaneously generates and collides with boundary branes, leading to the observed big bang without a spacetime singularity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the cyclic universe model
  • Familiarity with ekpyrotic universe theories
  • Knowledge of brane theory in string theory
  • Concept of higher-dimensional spaces, specifically five dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the ekpyrotic universe model in detail
  • Explore the implications of brane collisions on cosmology
  • Study the concept of bulk branes and their dynamics in higher dimensions
  • Examine the mathematical framework of string theory related to Calabi-Yau manifolds
USEFUL FOR

Cosmologists, theoretical physicists, and students of string theory interested in the dynamics of the universe's evolution and the implications of higher-dimensional models.

beno23
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
how do branes emerge in cyclic universe??

ok so in the cyclic model of the universe...two branes are colliding and this is causing big bangs every few trillion years. this solves nicely the initial singularity and explains many things

but i have two questions

1) how do these branes emerge? from what?

2) how is it possible for this collisions to be going on forever...i do not believe there is such thing as infinity becouse its not logical. all this had to have a beginning before it starts colliding, right?

...i hope someone can answer

.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


There are several models of the "ekpyrotic universe" models.

It is simplest to think of them as 5d models, and ignore the compact Calabi-Yau dimensions from string theory.

In one of them, the fifth dimension collapses and reinflates itself periodically. On each 4-boundary is a brane, one of which is our observed universe. The collapsed state corresponds to the big bang in our observed universe. As the traditional big bang model, this is also a severe geometrical singularity, so it would not be correct to say that it "solves" this. In that model, the branes always existed, and the model doesn't have an origin of time.

Then there is the "bulk brane" version, which has no such spacetime collapse singularity. Also in this case, two boundary branes always existed, but a spontaneous generation of a third "bulk brane" happens at on boundary. This bulk brane moves in the fifth dimension (in a potential generated by the interaction between it and the boundary branes), eventually colliding with the other boundary brane (our universe). This collision corresponds to the big bang as seen in our 4-d universe.

Since the second scenario doesn't contain a spacetime collapse singularity, I find it more attractive. If you want, you can take a look at some work I did on that model:

http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0502136
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K