MHB How Do Complex Numbers Relate to the Unit Disk and Their Properties?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Markov2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on complex numbers and their properties related to the unit disk, denoted as D. Participants are solving problems involving conditions for real numbers derived from complex expressions, modulus calculations, and relationships among complex numbers on the unit circle. Key points include proving that if z + 1/z is real, then z must either have zero imaginary part or lie on the boundary of D, and showing that the sum of reciprocals of three specific points on the boundary equals zero. Additionally, there are attempts to derive a formula for a sequence based on the powers of complex numbers, with hints provided for proving the results. The conversation highlights the need for collaboration and verification of ideas in tackling complex mathematical problems.
Markov2
Messages
149
Reaction score
0
I'll be posting problems and my ideas to solve them, probably if no idea exists, I'll need more help please!

Denote $D=\{z\in\mathbb C:|z|<1\}$

1) Show that if $z+\dfrac1z$ is a real number, then $\text{Im}(z)=0$ or $z\in\partial D.$

2) Let $z,w\in\mathbb C$ so that $z\in\partial D.$ Show that $\left| {\dfrac{{z + w}}{{\overline z w + 1}}} \right| = 1.$

3) Let $z_1,z_2,z_3\in\mathbb C$ so that $z_1,z_2,z_3\in\partial D$ and $z_1+z_2+z_3=0.$ Prove that $\dfrac{1}{{{z_1}}} + \dfrac{1}{{{z_2}}} + \dfrac{1}{{{z_3}}} = 0.$

4) Let $A = {\left( {\dfrac{{ - 1 + \sqrt 3 i}}{2}} \right)^n} + {\left( {\dfrac{{ - 1 - \sqrt 3 i}}{2}} \right)^n}.$ Prove that $A=\left\{\begin{array}{rl}2,&\text{if }n\text{ is multiple of }3.\\-1,&\text{Otherwise.}\end{array}\right.$

Attempts:

1) if $z+\dfrac1z$ is a real number, then $z + \dfrac{1}{z} = \overline {z + \dfrac{1}{z}} ,$ does this hold? Would it work if I do $z=x+iy$ ? But I don't see how to show that $z\in\partial D.$

2) It's simple algebra, I just put $z=a+bi$ and $w=c+di$ and show the modulus is 1.

3) I don't know if there's a faster way here, I mean by not setting $z_1=a+bi,$ and so on, is there a faster way to proceed?

4) I have $A = 2\cos \left( {\dfrac{{2\pi n}}{3}} \right)$ so if $n$ is a multiple of 3 the result follows, but I don't see how to conclude the second part.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Markov said:
I'll be posting problems and my ideas to solve them, probably if no idea exists, I'll need more help please!

Denote $D=\{z\in\mathbb C:|z|<1\}$

1) Show that if $z+\dfrac1z$ is a real number, then $\text{Im}(z)=0$ or $z\in\partial D.$

2) Let $z,w\in\mathbb C$ so that $z\in\partial D.$ Show that $\left| {\dfrac{{z + w}}{{\overline z w + 1}}} \right| = 1.$

3) Let $z_1,z_2,z_3\in\mathbb C$ so that $z_1,z_2,z_3\in\partial D$ and $z_1+z_2+z_3=0.$ Prove that $\dfrac{1}{{{z_1}}} + \dfrac{1}{{{z_2}}} + \dfrac{1}{{{z_3}}} = 0.$

4) Let $A = {\left( {\dfrac{{ - 1 + \sqrt 3 i}}{2}} \right)^n} + {\left( {\dfrac{{ - 1 - \sqrt 3 i}}{2}} \right)^n}.$ Prove that $A=\left\{\begin{array}{rl}2,&\text{if }n\text{ is multiple of }3.\\-1,&\text{Otherwise.}\end{array}\right.$

Attempts:

1) if $z+\dfrac1z$ is a real number, then $z + \dfrac{1}{z} = \overline {z + \dfrac{1}{z}} ,$ does this hold? Would it work if I do $z=x+iy$ ? But I don't see how to show that $z\in\partial D.$

2) It's simple algebra, I just put $z=a+bi$ and $w=c+di$ and show the modulus is 1.

3) I don't know if there's a faster way here, I mean by not setting $z_1=a+bi,$ and so on, is there a faster way to proceed?

4) I have $A = 2\cos \left( {\dfrac{{2\pi n}}{3}} \right)$ so if $n$ is a multiple of 3 the result follows, but I don't see how to conclude the second part.

What are you using $\partial D$ to represent?
 
Mmmm, I think it is for $|z|=1,$ does make sense?
 
Well for 1. I think it would be easiest to substitute $ z = x + iy$ and see what happens...
 
Can anybody check my work for 2), 3) and 4) please?
 
4.

Perhaps we should find a Polynomial with roots $cos(\frac{2n\pi}{3})$

f(x)=x^4-\frac{5}{4}x^2+\frac{1}{4}If we factorize it, we will get:

$(x-\frac{1}{2})(x+\frac{1}{2})(x-1)(x+1)$

You can prove that, when 3|n then A=1 or -1 and the rest is follows, I think... hmm!

---------- Post added at 10:29 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:56 AM ----------

3)

A huge hint:

$z_1,z_2,z_3$ are points of equilateral triangle(...that question from other post).

---------- Post added at 11:02 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:29 AM ----------

Some better solution for 4:

Put n=3k+1 and n=3k+2 and see what happens!
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
377