How Do Electrons Behave in a Half-Filled P Orbital?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DiracPool
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of electrons in a half-filled p orbital, focusing on quantum mechanical interpretations and experimental evidence regarding their spatial distribution and interactions. Participants explore concepts related to probability density, charge distribution, and the implications of electron spin.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether electrons in a p orbital are confined to one lobe or can be found in both, noting the zero probability of finding an electron between the lobes.
  • Another participant clarifies that the zero probability refers to a probability density, not an absolute probability, suggesting that electrons can be found in either lobe without needing to transition between them.
  • Concerns are raised about the interpretation of measurements, with one participant stating that most measurements reflect a time-averaged charge density rather than instantaneous positions.
  • Discussion includes the idea that if an electron were to occupy just one lobe, it would imply multiple states, conflicting with observations of symmetry in the orbital.
  • Participants discuss whether two electrons in a p orbital can be distinguished based on their charge density distributions and the role of their spins in accommodating each other.
  • One participant emphasizes that a single electron does not "zip" around the orbital but occupies both lobes according to a probability density distribution.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of electron behavior in p orbitals, with no consensus reached on the specifics of electron distribution and the implications of measurements. Some agree on the symmetrical nature of the orbital, while others question the implications of charge density and electron spin.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on interpretations of probability density and the challenges in measuring instantaneous positions of electrons. The discussion does not resolve the complexities of electron behavior in quantum mechanics.

DiracPool
Messages
1,254
Reaction score
514
I recently have been studying how the SE solutions produce orbitals in the atom. I understand that we are not to think of these classically as actual orbits, however, I am looking for a little clarification on a couple things. For one, it is relatively easy to see how two electrons may share a 1s spherical orbital. But what about a p orbital? Is each electron confined to one or the other lobes of the dumbbell? After all, there is a zero probability that the electron can be found between the lobes and therefore a zero probability that it can smoothly transition (classically at least) between the two.

I know that this is QM and that we are supposed to allow for these counterintuitive things to happen, but has there actually been any experiments that conclusively demonstrate that, in a half-filled p orbital, the SAME electron is found zipping around both lobes of the orbital. Or is it typically found in just one? In addition, are there any experiments that tell us whether two electrons filling a p orbital can be found in either lobe? Or that both can be found in one lobe at the same time and not the other? I’m guessing that if measurements have found that both electrons demonstrating opposite spins have an equal probability of being in either lobe at any given time, then I’ll have to accept that. I’m just looking for a less counterintuitive solution or visualization.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, there is no way to tell if two electrons are the same or different, other than measuring both positions at the same time. Most measurements look at a time-averaged charge density.

One can calculate the position of one electron in the frame where the other electron is at 0,0,0. I expect it's a numerical mess, and I suspect that most of the time it is in the other lobe, but not always.
 
"After all, there is a zero probability that the electron can be found between the lobes and therefore a zero probability that it can smoothly transition (classically at least) between the two."
Be careful. This is a probability density, not a probability. The prob. density vanishes only in a set of measure zero, so your intuitive picture is not really mathematically well-defined. I think.
If you have two electrons in the same p-Orbital, each has the same probability density (ignoring the complication of Coulomb repulsion between the electrons).
BTw, it's the same with the higher s-Orbitals - they all have radius values where psi vanishes.
 
Is each electron confined to one or the other lobes of the dumbbell? After all, there is a zero probability that the electron can be found between the lobes and therefore a zero probability that it can smoothly transition (classically at least) between the two.
No, as you say the orbital represents the probability of finding the electron at a particular point. The fact that it vanishes at z = 0 simply means that you won't ever find it at z = 0. But you can find it on either side - the electron does not have a continuous orbital motion, and therefore does not have to transition from one lobe to the other. It can be found in either lobe.
has there actually been any experiments that conclusively demonstrate that, in a half-filled p orbital, the SAME electron is found zipping around both lobes of the orbital. Or is it typically found in just one?
It don't zip, it just sits there! :smile: No, there is no doubt about this. The orbital is symmetrical in the z direction. If the electron occupied just one of the two lobes (choosing a lobe at random?) there would be two possible states, not one, which would be in total conflict with observation.
 
It don't zip, it just sits there! No, there is no doubt about this. The orbital is symmetrical in the z direction. If the electron occupied just one of the two lobes (choosing a lobe at random?) there would be two possible states, not one, which would be in total conflict with observation.

So, would it be accurate to say that a single electron in a p-orbital is not zipping around the orbital? It just simply occupies both lobes with a charge density distributed according to the probability density? And then when a second electron comes around the first electron simply accommodates it through both electrons mutually orienting their "spins" orthogonally to one another (however that trick may be manifested)?

In that scenario, then, I would assume that both electrons occupy both lobes of the orbital with a relatively equal charge density distribution distinguished only by some spin factor? Again, in that scenario, is there any way to distinguish one electron from the other, i.e., is there some inhomogeneity of the charge density distributions that may distinguish one electron from the other? Or, is there no way to distinguish them and we simply say that two electrons share this orbital with opposite spins and that's about all we can say about it?
 
"that's about all we can say about it?"
Yup
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K