How Do Falcon Attacks Alter the Flight Path of Their Prey?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mnafetsc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bird Collision
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the physics of a peregrine falcon's attack on a raven, specifically analyzing the collision dynamics. The falcon, weighing 620 g and traveling at 20.0 m/s, collides with a 1.40 kg raven moving at 9.0 m/s, resulting in the falcon bouncing back at 5.0 m/s. The participants attempt to calculate the angle of deflection of the raven and its speed post-collision using conservation of momentum principles. The calculations reveal errors due to assumptions about the collision's elasticity, emphasizing the need for accurate component analysis in inelastic collisions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of momentum principles
  • Knowledge of vector components in physics
  • Familiarity with elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Basic trigonometry, specifically arctangent calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of inelastic collisions in detail
  • Learn how to apply conservation of momentum in two dimensions
  • Explore vector decomposition techniques for collision analysis
  • Investigate the effects of mass and velocity on collision outcomes
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and collision dynamics, as well as educators seeking to illustrate real-world applications of momentum conservation.

mnafetsc
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



To protect their young in the nest, peregrine falcons will fly into birds of prey (such as ravens) at high speed. In one such episode, a 620 g falcon flying at 20.0 m/s hit a 1.40 kg raven flying at 9.0 m/s. The falcon hit the raven at right angles to its original path and bounced back at 5.0 m/s. (These figures were estimated by the author as he watched this attack occur in northern New Mexico.)

A.By what angle did the falcon change the raven's direction of motion?
B.What was the raven's speed right after the collision?

Homework Equations


P=mv

conservation of momentum


The Attempt at a Solution



I put the falcon on the y-axis and the raven on the x axis, I ten tried to find the a and y components of p then did theta= arctan9p2/p1) which gave me 45 degrees-wrong

I then tried to find the x and y components using
m_F_v_Fi + m_R_V_Ri = m_F_v_Ff + m_R_V_Rf

Solving for v_Rf for the x and y compents I got 9 and 8.16 respectively, the had theta= arctan(8.16/9)= 42 degrees again wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mnafetsc said:

Homework Statement



To protect their young in the nest, peregrine falcons will fly into birds of prey (such as ravens) at high speed. In one such episode, a 620 g falcon flying at 20.0 m/s hit a 1.40 kg raven flying at 9.0 m/s. The falcon hit the raven at right angles to its original path and bounced back at 5.0 m/s. (These figures were estimated by the author as he watched this attack occur in northern New Mexico.)

A.By what angle did the falcon change the raven's direction of motion?
B.What was the raven's speed right after the collision?

Homework Equations


P=mv

conservation of momentum


The Attempt at a Solution



I put the falcon on the y-axis and the raven on the x axis, I ten tried to find the a and y components of p then did theta= arctan9p2/p1) which gave me 45 degrees-wrong
Precisely how did you get that? Are you assuming a perfectly elastic collision? That's probably not correct. What percentage inelasticity are you assuming?

I then tried to find the x and y components using
m_F_v_Fi + m_R_V_Ri = m_F_v_Ff + m_R_V_Rf

Solving for v_Rf for the x and y compents I got 9 and 8.16 respectively, the had theta= arctan(8.16/9)= 42 degrees again wrong.
 
Pretty much I did p=sqrt(p_1_^2 +p_2_^2

But I realize that is wrong because its not elastic situation, I know is inelastic, but not perfectly inelastic so I used the second equation thinking that would work, I'm not quite sure were to go from there.
 
Never mind I was doing it correctly, I just kept making some unknown calculation error that kept giving me the wrong angle.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K