MHB How Do Frenet Equations Relate Torsion to Time Derivatives of Position?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torsion
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving an expression for torsion using Frenet equations and time derivatives of the position vector. The key equations include the definitions of the Frenet frame and the relationship between torsion and the derivatives of the position vector. Participants explore how to manipulate the Frenet equations to express torsion in terms of time derivatives, ultimately leading to the formula involving the cross product of velocity and acceleration vectors. There is uncertainty about specific steps in the derivation, particularly in transitioning between different forms of the equations. The conversation highlights the complexity of relating geometric properties of curves to their dynamic behavior through calculus.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Using Frenet equations, find an expression for the torsion in terms of time derivatives of the position vector.

The Frenet Equations are
\begin{align*}
\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}}{ds} &= \frac{1}{\rho}\hat{\mathbf{n}}\\
\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{b}}}{ds} &= -\frac{1}{\tau}\hat{\mathbf{n}}\\
\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{n}}}{ds} &= \frac{1}{\tau}\hat{\mathbf{b}} - \frac{1}{\rho}\hat{\mathbf{u}}
\end{align*}

The torsion in terms of time derivatives is
\begin{align*}
\tau &= \frac{\dot{\mathbf{r}}\times \ddot{\mathbf{r}}\cdot\ddot{\mathbf{r}}}
{\lvert\dot{\mathbf{r}}\times \ddot{\mathbf{r}}\rvert^2}
\end{align*}

I am not sure how to go from the equations to answer though.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Couple of comments:

1. It seems to me that some authors define
$$\frac{d \mathbf{b}}{ds}=- \tau \hat{\mathbf{n}}.$$

2. In either case, you can take this equation, and dot both sides into $\hat{\mathbf{n}}$ to solve for $\tau$. Then plug in from there.
 
Ackbach said:
Couple of comments:

1. It seems to me that some authors define
$$\frac{d \mathbf{b}}{ds}=- \tau \hat{\mathbf{n}}.$$

2. In either case, you can take this equation, and dot both sides into $\hat{\mathbf{n}}$ to solve for $\tau$. Then plug in from there.

So \(\hat{\mathbf{n}}\cdot\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{b}}}{ds} = \hat{\mathbf{n}}\cdot \left(\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}}{ds} \times\hat{\mathbf{n}} + \hat{\mathbf{u}}\times \frac{d\hat{\mathbf{n}}}{ds}\right) = -\frac{1}{\tau}\), and since \(\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}}{ds} = \frac{1}{\rho}\hat{\mathbf{n}}\), so the first term is zero due to \(\frac{1}{\rho} \hat{\mathbf{n}}\times \hat{\mathbf{n}} = 0\).

Then we are left with
\[
\hat{\mathbf{n}}\cdot \hat{\mathbf{u}}\times \frac{d\hat{\mathbf{n}}}{ds} = -\frac{1}{\tau}
\]

I am not sure how I am going to recover the time derivatives of \(r\) from the above expression.

I suppose I am making some progress now:

Torsion is defined as
\(-\frac{1}{\tau}\hat{\mathbf{n}} = \frac{d\hat{\mathbf{b}}}{ds}\).
Let's dot both side by \(\hat{\mathbf{n}}\).
\begin{align}
\frac{1}{\tau} &= -\hat{\mathbf{n}}\cdot \frac{d\hat{\mathbf{b}}}{ds}\\
&= -\rho\frac{d^2\mathbf{r}}{ds^2}\cdot \left(\hat{\mathbf{u}}\times
\rho\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}} {ds}\right)
\end{align}
Now let's write \(\frac{d^2\mathbf{r}} {ds^2}\) as
\begin{align}
\frac{d^2\mathbf{r}}{ds^2} &= \frac{d^2\mathbf{r}} {dt^2}
\left(\frac{dt} {ds}\right)^2\\
&= \frac{1} {v^2}\ddot{\mathbf{r}}
\end{align}
and substitute back into equation above.
\begin{align}
&= -\frac{\rho^2} {v^2}\ddot{\mathbf{r}} \cdot \left(\frac{\dot{\mathbf{r}}}{v}\times
\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}} {ds}\right)\\
&= ?\\
&= -\ddot{\mathbf{r}} \rho\cdot \left(\dot{\mathbf{r}}
\times\rho \ddot{\mathbf{r}}\right)_t\\
&= -\ddot{\mathbf{r}}\rho \cdot\left(\dot{\mathbf{r}}
\times\rho \dddot{\mathbf{r}}\right)\\
&= \frac{(\dot{\mathbf{r}} \times\ddot{\mathbf{r}}) \cdot
\dddot{\mathbf{r}}}
{\lvert \dot{\mathbf{r}} \times\ddot{\mathbf{r}} \rvert^2}
\end{align}

What is the ? step?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top