MHB How Do Frenet Equations Relate Torsion to Time Derivatives of Position?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dustinsfl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torsion
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving an expression for torsion using Frenet equations and time derivatives of the position vector. The key equations include the definitions of the Frenet frame and the relationship between torsion and the derivatives of the position vector. Participants explore how to manipulate the Frenet equations to express torsion in terms of time derivatives, ultimately leading to the formula involving the cross product of velocity and acceleration vectors. There is uncertainty about specific steps in the derivation, particularly in transitioning between different forms of the equations. The conversation highlights the complexity of relating geometric properties of curves to their dynamic behavior through calculus.
Dustinsfl
Messages
2,217
Reaction score
5
Using Frenet equations, find an expression for the torsion in terms of time derivatives of the position vector.

The Frenet Equations are
\begin{align*}
\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}}{ds} &= \frac{1}{\rho}\hat{\mathbf{n}}\\
\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{b}}}{ds} &= -\frac{1}{\tau}\hat{\mathbf{n}}\\
\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{n}}}{ds} &= \frac{1}{\tau}\hat{\mathbf{b}} - \frac{1}{\rho}\hat{\mathbf{u}}
\end{align*}

The torsion in terms of time derivatives is
\begin{align*}
\tau &= \frac{\dot{\mathbf{r}}\times \ddot{\mathbf{r}}\cdot\ddot{\mathbf{r}}}
{\lvert\dot{\mathbf{r}}\times \ddot{\mathbf{r}}\rvert^2}
\end{align*}

I am not sure how to go from the equations to answer though.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Couple of comments:

1. It seems to me that some authors define
$$\frac{d \mathbf{b}}{ds}=- \tau \hat{\mathbf{n}}.$$

2. In either case, you can take this equation, and dot both sides into $\hat{\mathbf{n}}$ to solve for $\tau$. Then plug in from there.
 
Ackbach said:
Couple of comments:

1. It seems to me that some authors define
$$\frac{d \mathbf{b}}{ds}=- \tau \hat{\mathbf{n}}.$$

2. In either case, you can take this equation, and dot both sides into $\hat{\mathbf{n}}$ to solve for $\tau$. Then plug in from there.

So \(\hat{\mathbf{n}}\cdot\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{b}}}{ds} = \hat{\mathbf{n}}\cdot \left(\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}}{ds} \times\hat{\mathbf{n}} + \hat{\mathbf{u}}\times \frac{d\hat{\mathbf{n}}}{ds}\right) = -\frac{1}{\tau}\), and since \(\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}}{ds} = \frac{1}{\rho}\hat{\mathbf{n}}\), so the first term is zero due to \(\frac{1}{\rho} \hat{\mathbf{n}}\times \hat{\mathbf{n}} = 0\).

Then we are left with
\[
\hat{\mathbf{n}}\cdot \hat{\mathbf{u}}\times \frac{d\hat{\mathbf{n}}}{ds} = -\frac{1}{\tau}
\]

I am not sure how I am going to recover the time derivatives of \(r\) from the above expression.

I suppose I am making some progress now:

Torsion is defined as
\(-\frac{1}{\tau}\hat{\mathbf{n}} = \frac{d\hat{\mathbf{b}}}{ds}\).
Let's dot both side by \(\hat{\mathbf{n}}\).
\begin{align}
\frac{1}{\tau} &= -\hat{\mathbf{n}}\cdot \frac{d\hat{\mathbf{b}}}{ds}\\
&= -\rho\frac{d^2\mathbf{r}}{ds^2}\cdot \left(\hat{\mathbf{u}}\times
\rho\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}} {ds}\right)
\end{align}
Now let's write \(\frac{d^2\mathbf{r}} {ds^2}\) as
\begin{align}
\frac{d^2\mathbf{r}}{ds^2} &= \frac{d^2\mathbf{r}} {dt^2}
\left(\frac{dt} {ds}\right)^2\\
&= \frac{1} {v^2}\ddot{\mathbf{r}}
\end{align}
and substitute back into equation above.
\begin{align}
&= -\frac{\rho^2} {v^2}\ddot{\mathbf{r}} \cdot \left(\frac{\dot{\mathbf{r}}}{v}\times
\frac{d\hat{\mathbf{u}}} {ds}\right)\\
&= ?\\
&= -\ddot{\mathbf{r}} \rho\cdot \left(\dot{\mathbf{r}}
\times\rho \ddot{\mathbf{r}}\right)_t\\
&= -\ddot{\mathbf{r}}\rho \cdot\left(\dot{\mathbf{r}}
\times\rho \dddot{\mathbf{r}}\right)\\
&= \frac{(\dot{\mathbf{r}} \times\ddot{\mathbf{r}}) \cdot
\dddot{\mathbf{r}}}
{\lvert \dot{\mathbf{r}} \times\ddot{\mathbf{r}} \rvert^2}
\end{align}

What is the ? step?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
555
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
591
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
648
Replies
1
Views
370
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K