MHB How Do I Apply Natural Deduction to These Logic Problems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TremblayFil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logic Natural
TremblayFil
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello guys,

I really need help from you about natural deduction. I just can't get to solve theses problems. Can anyone give me the solutions ? I've been trying for hours... Thanks a lot !

Premise 1 : B,
Premise 2 : C→(¬B∨A)
Premise 3: ¬C→¬(A∨B)
Conclusion : A≡C

____

Premise 1: (A∨B)∨C
Premise 2 : ¬B∧¬C
Conclusion : A

____

Premise : ¬(A ∨ B)
Conclusion : ¬A ∧ ¬B

_____

Premise : ¬A ∧ ¬B
Conclusion : ¬(A ∨ B)
Thank you so much !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, and welcome to MHB, TremblayFil! (Wave)

We ask that our users show their progress (work thus far or thoughts on how to begin) when posting questions. This way our helpers can see where you are stuck or may be going astray and will be able to post the best help possible without potentially making a suggestion which you have already tried, which would waste your time and that of the helper.

Also, and just for future reference, we ask that no more than 2 questions be posted per opening post. Follow-up questions regarding those problems initially posted are of course allowed, and even encouraged, but threads with a long list of questions can become convoluted and hard to follow.

Can you post what you have done so far?
 
TremblayFil said:
Hello guys,

I really need help from you about natural deduction. I just can't get to solve theses problems. Can anyone give me the solutions ? I've been trying for hours... Thanks a lot !

Premise 1 : B,
Premise 2 : C→(¬B∨A)
Premise 3: ¬C→¬(A∨B)
Conclusion : A≡C

____

Premise 1: (A∨B)∨C
Premise 2 : ¬B∧¬C
Conclusion : A

____

Premise : ¬(A ∨ B)
Conclusion : ¬A ∧ ¬B

_____

Premise : ¬A ∧ ¬B
Conclusion : ¬(A ∨ B)
Thank you so much !
What are the rules you are given to prove the above??
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...

Similar threads

Back
Top