How do I arrive at the title Understanding Series and Sequences in Calculus?

[sharkshockey]

Hope all of you had a good July 4th (for those that celebrate it)!

Anyways, I'm trying to figure out series and sequences. I'm using Stewarts' Single Variable Calculus: Early Transcendentals, 6th. ed.

For instance, under Section 11.4, the Comparison Tests, I don't understand how one arrives at b_n.

Example:

\Sigma^{\infty}_{n=1}\frac{1}{2^{n}-1}

The book then proceeds to state:

a_n = \frac{1}{2^{n}-1}, which I understand because it's written as \Sigmaa_n.

However, the book then proceeds to state that:

b_n = \frac{1}{2^{n}}, which I have no idea how they got there. Do I just remove all constants from a_n? Or do I remove all variables that are not attached by an "n"?


Also, my Calculus 1 is a bit rusty, but how exactly does (excerpted from p.717, Example 4 of Stewarts)

\frac{(n+1)^{3}}{3^{n+1}} \times \frac{3^{n}}{n^{3}}



=\frac{1}{3}(\frac{n+1}{n})³

=\frac{1}{3}(1+\frac{1}{n})³

=\frac{1}{3}

 

[sihag]

i don't have a copy of that book, so here's a conjecture (going by the looks of it):
that's the ratio test. you determine the ratio of (n+1)th term to the n th term as n approaches infinity, and conclude depending on whether the value obtained is greater or less that 1, the series is cgt or dvt. in this case it turns out to be 1/3.

 

[dirk_mec1]

Hope all of you had a good July 4th (for those that celebrate it)!

Anyways, I'm trying to figure out series and sequences. I'm using Stewarts' Single Variable Calculus: Early Transcendentals, 6th. ed.

For instance, under Section 11.4, the Comparison Tests, I don't understand how one arrives at b_n.

It's just implementing the comparison test:

 

[sharkshockey]

It's just implementing the comparison test:

View attachment 14612

Error: Does not compute.

Sorry, I'm still confused

 

[scorpion990]

I just skimmed your first post... I think this is relevant though:
B sub n is just some other series that was (almost) arbitrarily picked because it converges.

 

[BoundByAxioms]

You can use the limit comparison test. I don't know a good mathematical way to explain this, but when I learned that test, my instructor called b_n the "simpler version" of a_n. As it was stated earlier, we know that \sum^{\infty}_{n=0}\frac{1}{2^{n}} converges. So, the limit comparison test says that if lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}\frac{a_{n}}{b_{n}}=c, and c>0, then both a_n and b_n converge or both diverge, if b_n converges, so does a_n and the same goes for divergence.

 

[HallsofIvy]

\frac{1}{2^n-1}> \frac{1}{2^n}
because the numerator on the left is smaller than the numerator on the right. However, that really doesn't help because you want to show this converges so you need "<" not ">" to a convergent series.

You might say \frac{1}{2^n-1}&lt; \frac{2}{2^n}
and then argue that since 2\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{2^n} converges, so does \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{1}{2^n-1}

and, of course,
\frac{(n+1)^3}{3^{n+1}}\frac{3^n}{n^3}= \frac{3^n}{3^{n+1}}\left(\frac{n+1}{n}\right)^3
= \frac{1}{3}\left(1+ \frac{1}{n}\right)^3