How do I convert the number of efolds to conformal time during inflation?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Xepto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on converting the number of e-folds during inflation to conformal time, particularly in the context of numerical integrations involving a De Sitter expansion. Participants explore the relationship between the scale factor, e-folds, and conformal time, addressing integration limits and definitions of e-folds.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to establish a relationship between the number of e-folds (N) and conformal time (τ), proposing an initial guess for τ but expressing uncertainty about its correctness.
  • Another participant suggests that N is defined with respect to the end of inflation rather than the start, indicating a need for clarification on this point.
  • A further contribution derives the relationship between the scale factor (a) and N, stating that if the expansion is De Sitter, τ can be expressed in terms of N and the scale factor at the end of inflation.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the scale factor at a specific time can be renormalized and that the ratio of scale factors is more significant in cosmological contexts, reiterating the definition of N as the number of e-folds before the end of inflation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants appear to have differing views on the definition of e-folds and its relationship to conformal time, with no consensus reached on the correct formulation or integration limits.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved issues regarding the integration limits and the dependence of the scale factor on the definitions used for e-folds and conformal time.

Xepto
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
I need to convert the number of efolds to confromal time during inflation in order to do numerical integrations. Suppose expansion is De Sitter and you have to calculate the integral $$\int^0_{-\infty} d\tau F(N)$$ where F is a function of the efolds number N (from the beginning of inflation). All issues arise at the integration limits. I know that $$a = - \frac{1}{H \tau} $$ but I cannot obtain the correct relationship between N and τ.
(My guess is $$\tau = - \frac{1}{H e^N} $$ but this doesn't seem to be correct. In fact for ##N\rightarrow \infty## we get ##\tau \rightarrow 0##, but for ##N\rightarrow 0## we get ##\tau\rightarrow - \frac{1}{H}##)
Can anyone help me?
Thanks
 
Space news on Phys.org
What is the relationship between a and N? Hint: N is not defined with respect to the start of inflation, but the end.
 
bapowell said:
What is the relationship between a and N? Hint: N is not defined with respect to the start of inflation, but the end.
From ##dN = H dt##, we get $$N = \text{ln} \frac{a(t_{end})}{a(t)}$$. Tthen ##a(t) = a(t_{end}) e^{-N}##, that can be rewritten in terms of the number of efolds as ##a(N(t)) = a(N_{end}) e^{-N}.## If expansion is DeSitter, ##H## is a constant and $$ \tau = -\frac{1}{a(\tau) H} = - \frac{1}{a(N_{end}) e^{-N} H},$$ that can be inverted $$ N=\text{ln} \Biggl( - \frac{1}{\tau H a(N=0) } \Biggl). $$ If this is correct, how can I calculate the scale factor ##a## at the end of inflation?
 
If the universe grows by [itex]N[/itex] e-folds of expansion during inflation, then [itex]a_{end} = e^N a_i[/itex]. What's important is not the value of the scale factor at a particular time, because it can always be renormalized (e.g. the scale factor is often defined to be equal to 1 today). What's generally important in cosmology is the ratio of scale factors at two different times because this gives the amount of expansion.

Also, [itex]N[/itex] is defined as the number of e-folds before the end of inflation. This means that [itex]dN = -Hdt[/itex] -- the number [itex]N[/itex] gets smaller as inflation progresses, and becomes [itex]N=0[/itex] at the end.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K