How Do I Derive the Zeta Function Using Zeta Function Regularization?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 5K views
robousy
Messages
332
Reaction score
1
...on the off chance anyone knows this, I'm trying to get from:

[tex]V=\frac{1}{2A}Tr Log(\frac{-\Box}{\mu^2})[/tex]

to

[tex]V=\frac{(-1)^{\eta-1}}{4\pi^\eta\eta!}\frac{\pi}{L}^{D-1}\zeta'(1-D)[/tex]

I know this is a shot in the dark, but in case anyone has experience.

The paper I'm reading explains 'it is easy to show that' to get to the seconds equation ! I hate that. The paper also has a reference...the reference is Birrel and Davies, great I thought, I have that book, the reference is for p340, which takes me to the Index ! lol.

Anyway, I guess the key is figuring how the trace of the log of the box operator gives me the derivative of the zeta function.

Anyone??

:)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
D is the dimension of spacetime (5), eta is (D-1)/2 and the box operator is the flat space 5D operator. This is a paper where the Casimir energy is calculated in the bulk of the RS model.
 
Zeta-function evaluation of determinants is described quite well in Pierre Ramond's text, "Field Theory: A Modern Primer", Chapter 3. The derivation is long, but I think you'll find what you need there.

Hope that helps!

Out of curiosity, what paper are you trying to read?
 
Hey, Sorry for delayed repy blechman.
Thanks for the suggestion of ramond, I managed to borrow a copy from my supervisor.

Incidently I'm reading Radion Effective Potential in Brane World by Garriga, Pujolas and Tanaka.
 
robousy said:
Incidently I'm reading Radion Effective Potential in Brane World by Garriga, Pujolas and Tanaka.

You can check out TASI-2002 articles by C. Csaki; also M. Quiros has a bunch of good reviews out there on effective potenitals of higher dim fields. R. Sundrum has a TASI-2004 review that's pretty nice too.