MHB How do I determine the coordinates of points on a 3-D coordinate plane?

AI Thread Summary
Determining coordinates on a 3-D coordinate plane involves understanding the relationship between the x, y, and z axes. It is impossible to recover a point's coordinates from a 2-D picture due to the infinite possibilities of 3D points projecting to the same location. A practical method for finding coordinates is to visualize the point's position starting from the origin, moving along each axis according to the given values. Problems with connecting lines to the axes simplify the process, allowing for easier identification of coordinates by following straight paths. Accurate interpretation of the coordinates is essential for solving related problems effectively.
ssmith9bmr
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
View attachment 2428View attachment 2428

Can someone please help me with this? I can't for the life of me figure out how to do these points. How do I line up the x, y, and z? I just can't grasp it and can't find anything online.
 

Attachments

  • Homework.jpg
    Homework.jpg
    30.9 KB · Views: 89
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Concerning problem 1), it is impossible to recover coordinates of the shown point from a two-dimensional picture. That is, there is an infinite number of 3D points that, when drawn on a plane, would fall into the same position. However, we are also given four options, and of those only one corresponds to the required point.

View attachment 2432

The most reliable way to find the answer is to draw all four points. To draw a point with coordinates $(x_0,y_0,z_0)$ start with the origin, then move in the direction of the $x$ axis by $x_0$ (in the picture, this means moving bottom left for positive $x_0$), then move in the direction of the $y$ axis by $y_0$ (right for positive $y_0$) and finally in the direction of the $z$ axis by $z_0$ (up for positive $z_0$). But one can also see that the required point has a negative $z$ coordinate, and there is only one corresponding option.

Problem 2)

View attachment 2433

Problems 3) and 4) are easier because we have lines connecting the point with the coordinate axes. For 3), we first go up to the $xy$ plane and then left to the $x$ axis. We arrive at $x=4$. Similarly, going up and then towards the $y$ axis we arrive at $y=4$. Finally, going towards the $xy$ plane (where $z=0$) required going up 1 unit, so the $z$ coordinate is $-1$. Note that each time we move along a straight line segment, it must be parallel to one of the axes. The answer to 4) is $(-1,2,-4)$.
 

Attachments

  • coord2.png
    coord2.png
    2.8 KB · Views: 86
  • coord3.png
    coord3.png
    3.1 KB · Views: 95
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top