MHB How do I determine the coordinates of points on a 3-D coordinate plane?

ssmith9bmr
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
View attachment 2428View attachment 2428

Can someone please help me with this? I can't for the life of me figure out how to do these points. How do I line up the x, y, and z? I just can't grasp it and can't find anything online.
 

Attachments

  • Homework.jpg
    Homework.jpg
    30.9 KB · Views: 88
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Concerning problem 1), it is impossible to recover coordinates of the shown point from a two-dimensional picture. That is, there is an infinite number of 3D points that, when drawn on a plane, would fall into the same position. However, we are also given four options, and of those only one corresponds to the required point.

View attachment 2432

The most reliable way to find the answer is to draw all four points. To draw a point with coordinates $(x_0,y_0,z_0)$ start with the origin, then move in the direction of the $x$ axis by $x_0$ (in the picture, this means moving bottom left for positive $x_0$), then move in the direction of the $y$ axis by $y_0$ (right for positive $y_0$) and finally in the direction of the $z$ axis by $z_0$ (up for positive $z_0$). But one can also see that the required point has a negative $z$ coordinate, and there is only one corresponding option.

Problem 2)

View attachment 2433

Problems 3) and 4) are easier because we have lines connecting the point with the coordinate axes. For 3), we first go up to the $xy$ plane and then left to the $x$ axis. We arrive at $x=4$. Similarly, going up and then towards the $y$ axis we arrive at $y=4$. Finally, going towards the $xy$ plane (where $z=0$) required going up 1 unit, so the $z$ coordinate is $-1$. Note that each time we move along a straight line segment, it must be parallel to one of the axes. The answer to 4) is $(-1,2,-4)$.
 

Attachments

  • coord2.png
    coord2.png
    2.8 KB · Views: 83
  • coord3.png
    coord3.png
    3.1 KB · Views: 94
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top