~(p -> ~q) <=> ?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am having a heck of a time figuring this out, and I keep basically wanting to distribute the negation symbol to each individual simple statement in the conditional statement arriving at...

~[~(p -> ~q)] <=> ?

~(~p -> q) <=> ?

p -> ~q <=> ~p V ~q <=> ~(p ^ q)

But the book says I should come to p ^ q.

What am I doing wrong here.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# How do I find the equivalent statement to the statement ~(p -> ~q)

Loading...

Similar Threads - find equivalent statement | Date |
---|---|

I Confusion over using integration to find probability | Jun 27, 2017 |

I How To Find 68% Confidence Interval After Running MCMC | May 29, 2017 |

I Finding the average time with given probability | Apr 21, 2017 |

I How do I find the standardized coefficients? | Apr 3, 2017 |

How to find a logical statement equivalent to the one I have? | May 27, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**