Poirot1
- 243
- 0
Let B=(5,21), C=(40,-14) and $\frac{BP}{PC}$=1/6. What is the most efficent way to find P? My book just states P=(6/7)B+(1/7)C but no idea how they got that.
The discussion revolves around finding the point P that divides the segment between points B and C in a specific ratio, specifically where the ratio of distances from B to P and P to C is 1:6. Participants explore various methods to determine the coordinates of P, including algebraic approaches and geometric interpretations.
There is no clear consensus on the most efficient method to find P, as participants present differing approaches and interpretations of the problem. Some methods are more algebraic, while others are geometric, and there is uncertainty about the constraints of the problem.
Participants express varying assumptions about the problem's constraints and the nature of point P, leading to different interpretations and methods of solution. The discussion includes references to external mathematical concepts without resolving their applicability to the specific problem at hand.
Poirot said:Let B=(5,21), C=(40,-14) and $\frac{BP}{PC}$=1/6. What is the most efficent way to find P? My book just states P=(6/7)B+(1/7)C but no idea how they got that.
chisigma said:If x and y are the coordinates of P, then it must be...
$\displaystyle f(x,y)= 36\ (x-5)^{2} + 36\ (y-21)^{2} - (x-40)^{2} - (y+14)^{2}=0$ (1)
The (1) is a 'quadratic curve' as illustrated in...
Quadratic Curve -- from Wolfram MathWorld
Let $B=(5,21),\;C=(40,\text{-}14),\;\dfrac{BP}{PC}=\dfrac{1}{6}$
What is the most efficent way to find $P$ ?
|
| (5,21) +35
| B♥ → → → → → → +
| * ↓
| Po ↓
| * ↓ -35
----+-----------*-----↓------
| * ↓
| * ↓
| ♥C
| (40,-14)
|
Poirot said:Let B=(5,21), C=(40,-14) and $\frac{BP}{PC}$=1/6. What is the most efficent way to find P? My book just states P=(6/7)B+(1/7)C but no idea how they got that.
Poirot said:I've solved this now thanks to the answers.