How do I improve my skills in constructing mathematical proofs?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gop
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proofs
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Improving skills in constructing mathematical proofs requires a combination of practice and foundational knowledge. The discussion highlights the importance of mastering various proof techniques, including algebraic manipulations, epsilon-delta arguments, and mathematical induction. Participants emphasize that consistent practice and exposure to diverse mathematical topics are essential for developing proof-writing abilities. There is a consensus that perseverance and systematic study are key to overcoming challenges in understanding complex proofs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with First-Order Logic (FOL) for writing hypotheses and conclusions.
  • Understanding of epsilon-delta arguments in real analysis.
  • Knowledge of mathematical induction as a proof technique.
  • Experience with algebraic manipulations in fields.
NEXT STEPS
  • Practice constructing proofs involving multiple quantifiers and complex structures.
  • Study "Principles of Mathematical Analysis" by Walter Rudin to deepen understanding of proof techniques.
  • Explore additional mathematical topics to build a broader foundation before tackling advanced proofs.
  • Engage in collaborative proof-writing exercises with peers to enhance problem-solving skills.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone seeking to enhance their proof-writing skills in mathematical analysis and logic.

gop
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
Hi

First of all, I would like to mention that I can do proofs that involve algebraic manipulations (in a field i.e.) pretty well,
or proofs that involve epsilon-delta arguments or mathematical induction.
However, at the moment I'm reading "Principles of mathematical analysis" and I have a hard time to do the proofs on my own (maybe I can solve 1/3 of them).

I am used to write down the hypotheses and the conclusion in FOL (logic) and then I try to manipulate it to arrive at the conclusion.
This however (in my experience) works only well for proofs with a reasonably number of quantifiers (i.e. epsilon-delta arguments).

So my question would be how do you start a proof that involve a lot of quantification by writing it down in FOL or do you use another method?Another type of proofs, like the one why every real number has one unique n-th root, are a completely mystery to me. While I can follow it without problem I can't claim that I would have ever thought of that particular step etc..

What would you recommend? Just to practice more proofs (even if that means staring at the same equation for hours without solving it) or to continue with other mathematical topics and eventually reach a level of experience where the proofs can be done (I did the second in some fields of computer science and it worked quite well; however, this were obviously no proofs but rather examples of how to apply certain technique in a unusual way i.e.)

thx
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In my opinion, there's no other way to learn constructing correct and preferably elegant proofs than hard work and all the things that this entails. I think that both practicing more proofs and continuing with other mathematical topics till you are at a decent level and be able to do proofs that you previously couldn't, are things which given the right timing and combinations when you apply them, can lead you to a good learning. There's no secret, magical way or shortcut; the secret is in my opinion to not give up. Experience and expertise are things gained along the way provided that you work in a focused and systematic manner and wholeheartedly.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
12K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K