What Are the Steps to Solve the FRW Cosmological Model?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on solving the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) cosmological model, specifically addressing the relationships between density (##\rho##), scale factor (##a##), pressure (##p##), and other cosmological parameters. Key findings include that ##\rho## varies as ##\rho \propto a^{-12}## and that the pressure is defined as ##p = \frac{2}{\lambda^2}##. The discussion also explores the calculation of luminosity distance (##D_L##) in terms of redshift (##z##) and the age of the universe, emphasizing the need for further exploration of the relationship between ##x## and ##\lambda##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) equations
  • Familiarity with cosmological parameters such as density (##\rho##) and pressure (##p##)
  • Knowledge of differential equations and their applications in cosmology
  • Basic understanding of redshift (##z##) and luminosity distance (##D_L##)
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate the derivation of the relationship between ##x## and ##\lambda## in the FRW model
  • Learn about the implications of the equation of state parameter ##w## in cosmology
  • Explore the calculation of the event horizon in the context of the FRW model
  • Study the expansion of luminosity distance (##D_L##) in higher orders of redshift (##z##)
USEFUL FOR

Cosmologists, astrophysicists, and students studying general relativity and cosmology will benefit from this discussion, particularly those focusing on the FRW model and its implications for the universe's structure and evolution.

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



(a)Find how ##\rho## varies with ##a##.
(b) Show that ##p = \frac{2}{\lambda^2}##. Find ##B## and ##t_0##.
(c) Find ##w## and ##q_0##. What values of ##\lambda## makes the particle horizon infinite? Find the event horizon and age of universe.
(d) Find luminosity distance ##D_L## in terms of redshift ##z##. Find ##q_0## by expanding.[/B]

2013_B5_Q4.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Part(a)
For ##V_0 = 0##, we can see that ##\rho = P = \frac{1}{2} \dot \phi^2##. Thus ##w=1##. For dependency on ##a##:
\ddot \phi + 3(\frac{\dot a}{a})\dot \phi = 0
\dot \rho + 12(\frac{\dot a}{a}) \rho = 0
a^{-12}\frac{d}{dt}(\rho a^{12}) = 0
\rho \propto a^{-12}

Part (b)
I'll replace the ##p## by ##x## to avoid confusion with pressure ##P##. Given ##a(t) = t^x## and ##\phi = BM ln(\frac{t}{t_0})##, we have ##\frac{\dot a}{a} = \frac{x}{t}## and ##\dot \phi = \frac{BM}{t}## and ##\ddot \phi = -\frac{BM}{t^2}##.

Substituting into equation of motion:
\frac{-BM}{t^2} + 3\left(\frac{x}{t}\right)\left(\frac{BM}{t}\right) - \frac{\lambda V_0}{M} \left( \frac{t}{t_0} \right)^{-\lambda B}
BM(3x - 1) - \frac{\lambda}{M} V_0 t^2 \left( \frac{t}{t_0} \right)^{-\lambda B} = 0

Substituting into FRW equation:
\frac{x^2}{t^2} = \frac{8\pi G}{3} \left[ \frac{2}{2}\left(\frac{BM}{t}\right)^2 + V_0 \left( \frac{t}{t_0} \right)^{-\lambda B} \right]
x^2 = \frac{B^2}{6} + \frac{8 \pi G}{3}V_0 t^2 \left( \frac{t}{t_0} \right)^{-\lambda B}
Using our result from the equation of motion:
x^2 = \frac{B^2}{6}+ \frac{8 \pi G}{3} \left[ \frac{BM^2}{\lambda} (3x-1) \right]
x^2 - \left(\frac{B}{\lambda}\right)x + \left( \frac{B}{3\lambda} - \frac{B^2}{6} \right) = 0

Can't seem to get ##x## solely in terms of ##\lambda##, am I doing something wrong?

Part(d)
The metric for a flat, isotopic and homogeneous universe is given by
ds^2 = -c^2 dt^2 + a(t)^2 \left[ d\chi^2 + S^2(\chi) \left( d\theta^2 + sin^2\theta d\phi^2 \right) \right]

Flux is given by ##F = \frac{L}{4\pi D_L^2}##. From the metric, proper area is given by ##A = 4\pi(a_0 \chi)^2 = 4\pi \chi^2##. But due to redshift, photons are delayed by ##\nu_0 = \frac{\nu_e}{1+z}##. Thus we have
D_L = \chi(1+z)
where ##\chi## is the comoving distance.
This is only in first order, how do I expand it in 2nd order?!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Would appreciate help on parts (b) and (c), but I made a slight bit of progress on part (d).

Part (d)
We know that ##D_L = \chi (1+z)##. I now need to re-express ##\chi## in terms of ##z##. For a light-like geodesic,
\chi = c \int \frac{1}{a(t)} dt
I read a useful trick is ##dz = d(1+z) = - \frac{\dot a}{a^2} dt = -(1+z) H(z) dz##. Substituting in,
\chi = c \int_0^z \frac{1}{H(z)} dz
D_L = c(1+z) \int_0^z \frac{1}{H(z)} dz
Using ##H(z) = H_0 \left[ 1 + (1+q_0)z + \cdots \right] ##:
D_L \approx \frac{c(1+z)}{H_0} \int_0^z \frac{1}{1 + (1+q_0)z} dz
D_L \approx \frac{c(1+z)}{H_0} \int_0^z \frac{1}{1 + (1+q_0)z} dz
D_L = \frac{c(1+z)}{H_0(1+q_0)} ln \left[ 1 + (1+q_0)z \right]
D_L \approx \frac{c(1+z)}{H_0(1+q_0)} \left[ (1+q_0)z - \frac{\left[ (1+q_0)z \right]^2}{2} \right]
D_L \approx \frac{c}{H_0}z \left[1 + \frac{z}{2}(1-q_0) \right]
 
Last edited:
bump on part (b)..
 
bump part (b)
 
Bump on part (b) - How do I get ##x## in terms of ##\lambda##?
 
Would appreciate help with part (b) please
 
any luck with solving ##x(\lambda)##?
 
anyone had a go with part (b)?
 
Still can't see how you can find ##p(\lambda)##..
 
  • #10
anyone else tried part (b) yet?
 
  • #11
bumpp part (b)
 
  • #12
bump on (b) and (c)
 
  • #13
bump on part (b) first
 
  • #14
bump on (b)
 
  • #15
part (b) bumping
 
  • #16
bump on part (b)
 
  • #17
bumpp on part (b)
 
  • #18
bumpp - I think there is a trick somewhere (dimensional analysis or something)
 
  • #19
bump
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
2K