How Do I Transform Coefficients in a Taylor Series Differential Equation?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around transforming coefficients in a second-order differential equation with variable coefficients, specifically focusing on the Taylor series expansion around a singular point. Participants explore methods for rewriting terms to facilitate the summation process in the context of the differential equation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a second-order differential equation and describes their approach using a Taylor series expansion centered at x_0=4.
  • Another participant suggests eliminating the "x" in the denominator by multiplying through by x and provides a reformulation of the series to include terms of the form (x-4).
  • Participants discuss the need to convert various terms (like "x", "x-5", and "x^2-4") into forms that involve (x-4) for consistency in the summation.
  • There is a clarification regarding a potential typo in the summation arguments, specifically the omission of an "x" in one term and an extra 'n' in another.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the method of transforming the coefficients but there are minor disagreements regarding specific details and potential typos in the expressions presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the algebraic manipulation required to rewrite the coefficients properly, indicating a reliance on assumptions about the forms of the terms involved.

vermin
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
So, I have this DE which is 2nd order, w/ variable coefficients, it goes;
xy''+(x-5)y'+(x^2-4)y=0 revolving around x_0=4.

I know there's a singular point at 0 and I assume to use a summation y(x)=[∞,Ʃ,n=0] a_n(x-x_0)^n
pardon me I don't know how to type the summation symbol, but that's supposed to be starting at n=0 going to infinity, I'm using x_0 for 'x sub 0', etc.

Well I take the 1st and 2nd derivatives of that sum and plug them into the ODE, having divided the y' and y coefficients by x so that y'' is alone. Then I'm left with the following;

http://files.royw.airpost.net/summm.jpg

my problem is, I was told on other problems that any x-terms as coefficients outside (such as the two in blue, to the left of the summation symbols) should be re-written to include the form of the x-term inside the sums. So, I need them to involve (x-4), so I can factor them out later. But maybe my algebra is weak, because I don't know what to do here. I've already stumped two math majors with this situation so I'm thinking maybe I took a wrong turn to lead me into this.

Any help would be appreciated! thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first thing you need to do is get rid of that "x" in the denominator by multiplying through by x:
\sum_{n=0}^\infty n(n-1)x(x- 4)^{n-2}+ (x- 5)\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nnx(x- 4)^{n-1}+ (x^2- 4)\sum_{n=0}^\infty a_nn(x- 4)^n= 0
Now you will have to convert the "x" in the first sum, the "x- 5" in the second, and both "x- 2" and "x+ 2" (factors of x^2- 4) to "x- 4" so it can be included in the powers.

x= x- 4+ 4 so "x(x-4)^{n-2}= (x- 4+ 4)(x- 4)^{n-2}= (x- 4)^{n-1}+ 4(x- 4)^{n-2}".

x- 5= x- 4- 1 so (x- 5)(x- 4)^{n-1}= (x-4- 1)(x- 4)^{n-1}= (x-4)^n- (x- 4)^{n-1}.

x^2- 4= (x- 2)(x+ 2)= (x- 4+ 2)(x- 4+ 6)= (x- 4)^2+ 8(x- 4)+ 12 so (x^2- 4)(x- 4)^n= (x- 4)^{n+2}+ 8(x- 4)^{n+1}+ 12(x- 4)^n.
 
ok, thanks! I didn't realize I could move the x inside first.
 
wait, on the 3rd term you didn't include an X in the summation argument. I'm assuming that was a typo...?
also, it looks like I included an extra 'n' that shouldn't have been there on the 3rd summation between a_n and (x-4), sorry.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K