How do I use bivectors to find the electric field in a weak magnetic field?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on utilizing bivectors to determine the electric field in a weak magnetic field scenario, specifically when the magnetic field, B, is set to zero. The geodesic equation is presented, along with the weak-field metric, ds² = -(1+2φ)dt² + (1-2φ)(dx² + dy² + dz²). The procedure to find the electric field E involves using the covariant object Fμν and the frame-dependent quantities Eμ and Bμ, which can be derived from the four-velocity uμ. The discussion highlights the Lorentz invariance of the bivector formalism and provides a reference for further reading.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the geodesic equation in general relativity
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic field tensors, specifically Fμν
  • Knowledge of Lorentz transformations and invariance
  • Basic concepts of bivectors and complex vector fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the geodesic equation in general relativity
  • Learn about the electromagnetic field tensor Fμν and its applications
  • Research Lorentz invariance and its implications in physics
  • Explore the bivector formalism in classical electromagnetism
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in electromagnetism and general relativity, as well as advanced students seeking to deepen their understanding of the relationship between electric and magnetic fields through bivector analysis.

darida
Messages
35
Reaction score
1
Geodesic equation:

[itex]m_{0}\frac{du^{\alpha}}{d\tau}+\Gamma^{\alpha}_{\mu\nu}u^{\mu}u^{\nu}= qF^{\alpha\beta}u_{\beta}[/itex]

Weak-field:

[itex]ds^{2}= - (1+2\phi)dt^{2}+(1-2\phi)(dx^{2}+dy^{2}+dz^{2})[/itex]

Magnetic field, [itex]B[/itex] is set to be zero.

I want to find electric field, [itex]E[/itex], but don't know where to start, so could someone give me a procedure to find it?

Thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
##F_{\mu\nu}## is a covariant object but ##E^{\mu}## and ##B^{\mu}## are not i.e. they are frame dependent quantities. They only have meaning if you have a background observer with 4-velocity ##u^{\mu}## who can decompose ##F_{\mu\nu}## into ##E^{\mu}## and ##B^{\mu}## relative to ##u^{\mu}##.

Once you have such a ##u^{\mu}##, then ##E^{\mu} = F^{\mu}{}{}_{\nu}u^{\nu}## and ##B^{\mu} = -\frac{1}{2}\epsilon^{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}F_{\alpha\beta}u_{\nu}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
That's not entirely true. You can build a formalism of classical electromagnetics with socalled bivectors by representing the electromagnetic field with [itex]\mathbb{C}^3[/itex] vector fields,
[tex]\vec{\mathfrak{E}}=\vec{E} + \mathrm{i} \vec{B}.[/tex]
This makes use of the group-isomorphism [itex]\mathrm{SO}(1,3)^{\uparrow} \simeq \mathrm{SO}(3,\mathbb{C}).[/itex]

Thus the product
[tex]\vec{\mathfrak{E}}^2=\vec{E}^2-\vec{B}^2 + 2\mathrm{i} \vec{E} \cdot \vec{B}[/tex]
is Lorentz invariant wrt. to proper orthochronous Lorentz transformations, and indeed also the four-vector formalism shows that the corresponding invariants given by the real and imaginary part of the bivector scalar product are proportional to the invariants [itex]F_{\mu \nu} F^{\mu \nu}[/itex] and [itex]\epsilon_{\mu \nu \rho \sigma} F^{\mu \nu} F^{\rho \sigma}=F^{\mu \nu} F^{\dagger}_{\mu \nu}[/itex].

A nice review on this funny bivector formalism can be found here:

http://arxiv.org/abs/1211.1218
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K