How do I use the four axioms of a neighborhood to define an open set?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter learning physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General topology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on defining an open set using the four axioms of topological neighborhoods, as outlined in the Wikipedia article on topological spaces. An open set is characterized as a neighborhood of all its points, which can be visualized as a "Big Neighborhood" containing smaller neighborhoods around each point. The conversation emphasizes the relationship between these neighborhoods and the intuitive understanding of open sets, highlighting the infinite nesting of smaller neighborhoods within the larger set.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of topological spaces
  • Familiarity with the concept of neighborhoods in topology
  • Knowledge of the four axioms of neighborhoods
  • Basic grasp of real number line properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the four axioms of neighborhoods in topology
  • Study the definition and properties of open sets in topological spaces
  • Explore examples of neighborhoods in various topological spaces
  • Learn about the relationship between open sets and continuity in topology
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of topology, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of open sets and neighborhoods in topological spaces.

learning physics
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
How do I use the four axioms of a neighborhood to define an open set?
How do I define an open set using only the four axioms of topological neighborhoods, as per the Wikipedia article on topological spaces?

The intuitive definition of an open set is that it's a set of points on a real number line containing only points at which there is room for some hypothetical point-sized particle to move on either side.

I can see that an open set is defined as a neighborhood of all of its points, but how does this fit with the intuitive definition?

Suppose that we call a set of points that acts as a neighborhood of all of its points "The Big Neighborhood." Each point in The Big Neighborhood is contained in a neighborhood that is contained in The Big Neighborhood, which we'll call "smaller neighbrohoods." Each point in The Big Neighborhood is contained in a neighborhood that is contained in a smaller neighborhood. And so on.

So, I can see that each point in a neighborhood of all of its points is buried inside an infinite nest of smaller and smaller sets. But I don't see how this fits with the intuitive definition. Can anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You better include a link to the reference that defines the four axioms you are talking about. I can't find what you are talking about in Wikipedia.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K