How Do Ice Formation and Salinity Affect Water Column Depth and Pressure?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Smazmbazm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of ice formation and salinity on water column depth and pressure in a physics homework context. Participants explore the implications of cooling water columns with different salinities and the resulting changes in pressure and depth after ice formation.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the pressure exerted by the ice cap using the formula ρgh and arrives at a depth of 100.08m for fresh water, expressing uncertainty about the correctness of their approach.
  • Another participant questions the change in pressure at the bottom of the column, suggesting that the mass of the column remains constant and therefore the pressure should not change.
  • A third participant proposes using the answer from the depth calculation to determine the pressure at the bottom, indicating a dependency on the result from the previous part of the problem.
  • A later reply asserts that while it is possible to use the sum of pressures from water and ice to calculate the total pressure, it is unnecessary since the mass and acceleration due to gravity remain unchanged.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether the pressure at the bottom of the column changes after ice formation, with some arguing it does not change while others suggest it may depend on the calculated depth.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the impact of ice formation on the overall pressure and depth calculations, and the discussion reflects varying interpretations of the physical principles involved.

Smazmbazm
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider two otherwise identical columns of water: one fresh, the other with an initial salinity of 35 pus. Both are initially isothermal at 4°C and each column is 100m deep. There is no horizontal mixing. Both columns are then cooled slowly under calm conditions until ice forms to a thickness of 1m.

Homework Equations



I've managed most my self but am stuck on:

(e) Once the ice has formed, how has the depth of each column (from the bottom of the column to the top of the ice) changed?

(f) One the ice has formed, how has the pressure at the bottom of each column changed?

The Attempt at a Solution



My idea was, using ρgh, one would could determine the pressure exerted by the ice cap.

Taking ρ = 916.7 kg / m^3, I get 1 * 916.7 * 9.80665 = 8,989.8 Pa.

Because the water at the bottom is the same density as before it was cooled, I thought I could use the value I calculated of the pressure before cooling and then determine the height.

I had 1,081,990 Pa before cooling at the bottom so if I subtract the ice cap's pressure, I get 1,073,000.2 Pa.

Subtract atmospheric pressure of 101,325 Pa to get 971,675.2 Pa. Then 971,675.2 = ρgh = 1000 * 9.80665 * h which gives a height of 99.08m. Resulting depth would be 100.08m (fresh water).

I'm quite unsure about this. The result makes sense, as water expands when it freezes, but it doesn't feel like the proper way of solving the problem. I'm not sure how else to tackle it though.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure about (e), but I don't see why pressure in (f) would change at all. The only thing that counts is mass of the column (approximated by ρh for a uniform column), and that didn't change.
 
The way the problems progress suggest that you would use your answer for (e) to calculate the pressure at the bottom for (f). Something like 101325 + (1*916.7*9.80665) + ( whatever the answer from (e) for height was * 1000 * 9.80665) which would result in the pressure. That's why I'm unsure about my answer for (e). I have a lecture on it today so I will ask my lecturer and post his response.
 
Well, for sure you can use sum of ρgh for water and ρgh for ice to calculate the pressure, it is just completely unnecessary. ρgh is nothing else but mass times acceleration, and neither changes, regardless of how the density is distributed.

For a very high column g would be a function of distance from the center of the Earth, but that's not the case here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
50
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K