How do know if something is red-shifted without prior knowledge?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Saoist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Knowledge
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of identifying redshift in astronomical light without prior knowledge of the original wavelength. Participants explore the methods of determining redshift, particularly through the recognition of spectral lines and the challenges associated with varying chemical compositions of celestial sources.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to determine if light is redshifted without knowing the original wavelength, expressing confusion over the circular reasoning involved in calculating redshift and source velocity.
  • Another participant asserts that familiar groupings of line spectra can be used to identify redshift, noting that most astronomical sources primarily consist of hydrogen and helium, which simplifies the identification process.
  • Some participants acknowledge that while spectral lines can vary based on chemical composition, they argue that elements can still be distinctly identified, even when redshifted.
  • There is a mention of historical confusion regarding the identification of elements in quasar absorption and emission lines, suggesting that initial misidentifications were later clarified.
  • A participant humorously notes that forbidden lines could have caused confusion in spectral identification.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the reliability of spectral line identification for determining redshift, with some asserting it is effective while others highlight potential complications due to varying chemical compositions. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the extent of these complications.

Contextual Notes

Participants do not fully resolve the implications of varying chemical compositions on spectral identification, nor do they clarify the assumptions underlying their claims about redshift detection.

Saoist
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
sorry if this sounds a tad retarded but astronomical topics arent my forte...how do know if something is red-shifted without prior knowledge?

say you've got light emitted from galaxy far far away at 500nm, and it ends up on Earth at 510nm. how can you differentiate between 510nm actual radiation and 500nm radiation red shifted?

it sounds like circular reasoning to me: by the amount of red shift, you can figure out the source velocity, except you don't know the original wavelength, so we can figure it out from the shift, except to know the original wavelength you need to know the shift already and hence the velocity...aaand now I'm confused.

i thought you could do it by recognising familiar groupings of line spectra...but surely the spectra will vary according to what the source is composed of etc.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Saoist said:
i thought you could do it by recognising familiar groupings of line spectra...
Yes, this is how it's done.
Most sources hardly consist of anything but hydrogene and helium, so there's no problem with identifying these lines.
 
Saoist said:
i thought you could do it by recognising familiar groupings of line spectra...but surely the spectra will vary according to what the source is composed of etc.
In addition to what EL said, those spectra vary so much based on the chemical composition that elements really can't be mistaken for other elements, redshifted.
 
russ_watters said:
In addition to what EL said, those spectra vary so much based on the chemical composition that elements really can't be mistaken for other elements, redshifted.

Well, they were initially, but once it was pointed out, it was pretty unambiguous. :smile:

It's amusing some of the elements they used to identify with quasar absorption and emission lines.
 
forbidden lines would have been a great source of confusion!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K