How do massive stars like VY Canis not turn into black holes

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the mechanisms that allow massive stars, such as VY Canis Majoris and R136a1, to remain stars rather than collapsing into black holes. It explores theoretical aspects of stellar evolution, gas pressure, radiation pressure, and the conditions under which these stars might eventually become black holes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that as long as massive stars have fuel for fusion, they can maintain a radius larger than the Schwarzschild radius, preventing black hole formation.
  • One participant explains that gas pressure counteracts gravitational collapse, and this balance allows for a range of stellar radii solutions, with larger radii preventing black holes from forming initially.
  • Another participant mentions that stars radiate energy, which could lead to a contraction of the star's radius over time unless compensated by other energy sources or pressure mechanisms.
  • There is a discussion about degeneracy pressure and its role in preventing black hole formation, with some participants suggesting it is primarily applicable to low-mass stars.
  • One participant highlights that very massive stars like VY Canis Majoris are expected to end as core collapse supernovae, but the pathway to black hole formation remains uncertain.
  • Radiation pressure is noted as a significant factor in the equilibrium of very massive stars, although its dominance varies with mass.
  • Some participants argue that while radiation pressure is important for massive stars, it may not always be the dominant force, suggesting a nuanced view of the pressures at play.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the mechanisms that prevent massive stars from becoming black holes, and the discussion remains unresolved on the specifics of these processes.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the assumptions made about the balance of forces in massive stars, the definitions of pressure types, and the conditions under which black holes form from supernovae.

blarznik
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Apparently VY Canis Majoris is 30–40 solar masses, also there's R136a1 which is 265 solar masses. How do they remain stars with all that mass?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
blarznik said:
Apparently VY Canis Majoris is 30–40 solar masses, also there's R136a1 which is 265 solar masses. How do they remain stars with all that mass?

As long as they have fuel (hydrogen, etc.) the fusion that takes place keeps their radii larger than the Schwarzschild radius, they remain stars. When they run out of fuel, then things will happen with remnants ending up as a black hole.
 
blarznik said:
Apparently VY Canis Majoris is 30–40 solar masses, also there's R136a1 which is 265 solar masses. How do they remain stars with all that mass?
What are their colours/temperatures and metallicities?
 
What keeps very massive stars from becoming black holes, for awhile, is gas pressure. Gas pressure tries to make stars expand, gravity tries to make them contract. If we assert that the two balance, for any given mass star, we get a whole range of possible solutions that essentially depend on the radius of the star. So for any radius, there's a solution where gas pressure balances gravity-- with one important exception. Because of the "nonlinear" nature of very strong gravity, if the radius of the star ever gets so small that its escape speed approaches the speed of light, gravity turns into a very different kind of beast, and pressure has no chance against it. But that's all right-- the stars you mention have much larger radii than that, they have found one of the solutions of gas pressure balancing gravity that does not allow gravity to become that beast.

Now this state of affairs would always prevent black holes from forming, except for one thing-- stars radiate energy. This means that unless the star has some other source of energy to replace what is lost, or some other way of creating pressure, the radius must contract to a different one of those balanced solutions. The star keeps losing starlight, smaller and smaller radius solutions keep resulting, and the star is on the way to gravity becoming that beast.

Now, I mentioned the two wrinkles in this general story-- other sources of energy (fusion), and other sources of pressure (degeneracy pressure). While stars are fusing, they replace the lost starlight, and there is no need to contract to a smaller-radius balanced solution-- while the fuel lasts. But it doesn't last, so it's just a delay in the process (a long-lived delay, to be sure). So then the only way to stop the creation of the black hole, eventually, is if degeneracy pressure can step in for the gas pressure. That turns out to only be possible for low-mass stars-- and that's why low-mass stars never go supernova and never make black holes. But for high-mass stars, the end result is inevitable-- it just takes a long time.

(Incidentally, there is a form of degeneracy pressure that can be created by neutrons, and this is important in neutron stars. But to get those, you still need to supernova, so there's not really a huge difference between making a neutron star, and making a black hole, unless you really like black holes.)
 
Heavyweaight like VY Canis Majoris are destined to end spectacularly as core collapse supernovae. It is less clear if black holes can directly form via such an event. In 2005 [re: http://www.space.com/1735-neutron-star-black-hole-expected.html] a neutron star was found which had a progenitor mass comparable to VY CMa. Core collapse supernova explosions expel a large fraction of the progenitor star mass.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A star has outward force that counteract gravity to keep it in equilibrium, these are due to gas pressure and radiation pressure. For very massive stars, radiation pressure is the dominant one.
 
For stars of 30-40 solar masses, radiation pressure is important, but still not dominant. It's kind of a detail really, but you're certainly right that it should not be overlooked. The same above argument applies, just think in terms of gas+radiation pressure.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
10K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
10K